craig 5,199 Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 I kept getting told on here we don't need fullbacks, we've got fullbacks coming out our ears!!!! I dont think we need left full backs. Right back we have Whittaker, if he gets chosen there - we do need another RB. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 We've got Kirk Broadfoot - what more could we ask for:devil: Right back should definitely be number one priority. A creative midfielder should then be next on the list. I would rather we went for the creative midfielder first - I think our SPL challenge faltered more because of a lack of creativity than any deficiencies in the RB position. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 I hope Whittaker does play RB as he isnt what we need in our midfield at all. But we may still need a back up for him or even better someone better! LB we are covered, I hope S Smith gets a good pre season and gets some form going. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Our defence was domestically worse than Celtic's last year so really needs improved. I also think our attacking options and creativity could improve if we changed both full backs (Broadfoota and Papac) to players who like to get forward. I hear Spurs have just the player for right back, how much do you think he'd cost us? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ascender 352 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Tha's the thing, we really missed Hutton's attacking input on the right after he left. So maybe the lack of new wingers isn't a bad thing if we can get the full backs sorted. Maybe Whittaker deserves a run on the right? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 I didnt think Papac was too bad going forward, he just seemed to restrict himself with going into the final 3rd. but to start breaks he was good. Pity he couldnt play RB then we could get S Smith back in at LB. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
br1ndy 0 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 I didnt think Papac was too bad going forward, he just seemed to restrict himself with going into the final 3rd. but to start breaks he was good. Pity he couldnt play RB then we could get S Smith back in at LB. Would whittaker be on the bench for you then Gribz if papac had a right foot? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
juffery 0 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 PAPAC IS A CENTRE HALF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurlock 0 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 We were looking at a rough-tough Argie left-back the other day who plays with Monaco. What happened there ? Just newspaper rubbish as usual or is there any truth to the matter ? I think Whittaker will start the season as right-back. But left-back is between Sasa and Stevie Smith at the moment. Sasa has a better defensive mind than Stevie but Stevie is better going forward. Tricky decision for Walt & Ally. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,366 Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 PAPAC IS A CENTRE HALF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He's more of a left back than centre half, in my opinion. Doesn't look half the player at centre half. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.