All Activity

No. Especially not a surly looking stick insect.

I think Coady would do a decent job for us*. Davies will surely be offski. I'm really hoping Tav will have some new competition at RB, so will be used sparingly and if Martin wants good passers, he'll not want Jefte in the team. *first name red flag though

This is the stuff of nightmares. Imagine that being our back line. Jesus wept, I honestly keep praying this is all some nightmare with a prank at the end,

Well we need a Garibaldi in the dugout.

Yes, but would you swap her for a self-important stick insect?

How long does he actually have left? Im hoping its not a black and white situation and we can negotiate him a new deal so he stays this upcoming season and let him leave for X amount next summer. I know there isnt much loyalty in football but we did nurse him through the best part of 2 years. He was almost becoming the new Jordan Rossiter when he first came.

Get Ready for three at the back. A Proper Darling partnership with LGBT activist, Coady, between them. 😂

Darling is a freebie, is he not?

In this case the mockery is quality humour...

This is where appointing that Everton bloke and Martin concerns me. Definitely has a more of the same kinda vibe. The English market is expensive and overrated. Darling is also a stupid name, asking to be mocked. We should be looking at the Balkans and other leagues similar to our own.

Fantastic to see the club finally rejecting those pesky value-for-money European signings in favour of the tried and tested method: overspending on Championship players We're so back

I'd point out the obvious error but I'd just get a telling off, so will refrain. You're welcome. 😀

If Raskin doesn't sign a new contract we have to sell him. We can't continue the cycle of our best players / assets running their contracts down and leaving for nothing (or next to nothing). That's what the previous board did and it led to a situation where we were unable to operate / function. We can't (and won't) continue down that road.

On brand for the old board.

Thats the spirit. Bring back the bowling club committee.

Oh your back, missed you.

It did get sorted, the charlatans were removed after over a decade of mismanagement that was excused by too many (Rangers men, their keeping thr lights on, they'll fix everything). You've put some spin on it tho - 10 years v 10mins - as I said bonkers.

I almost made the error of giving Inter Milan 2 wins until I realised Inter Miami were in it. I didnt plan on watching much of it but I am interested to see how the big European sides treat it and how the South American sides play.

I personally would be more positive and more ambitious than this. We cant be selling our best player if we have hope of winning the league next season and there is no reason why we cant. We have proved in the past 12 months we can now match and beat Celtic and its only tidying up performances against the other teams that has prevented us challenging. If we can get a season in the champions league it outweighs any fee we get for Raskin. If we get good profits on Igamane and Dessers then that is good income. If we are planning on another rebuild and the aim is just to get closer to Celtic next season then its negative and yes we may as well sell Raskin now if he hasnt put pen to paper on a long term deal and we can remain happy being second fiddle for another few years. EDIT - should add the aim and its not a complex one should be to get Raskin signed up with a release clause yet if he wants to leave then thats a different matter. The Morelos and Kent situation was under a badly run regime so these new owners have not even got their feet under the desk yet so lets see what the come up with. I also think Raskin's attitude is better than the said two players. But I think you take the wee man out the team then it would leave a massive gap.