Jump to content

 

 

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 24/09/21 in all areas

  1. I dont mind the theory behind selling stadium naming rights. I will always just call it Ibrox anyway. Just as I do the Copland, Govan, Main Stand and Broomie. I do not care that someone named it after Sandy Jardine or Bill Struth, I do not recognise those names and never refer to those stands as such. Therefore sell it, get a large fee for it, and our fans still know what our stadium is called. As for anything Chris McLaughlin has to say, count me out. I wouldn't trust him to tell me the day or time.
    4 points
  2. Even if they'd had a meeting about it, who cares? Rangers are at liberty to explore options. If they took the option up, the conflict would no longer have existed. Since no agreement was made, a conflict does exist. It's another smear story with no substance to it whatsoever.
    4 points
  3. I hope we never sell naming rights. And if we must have sponsorship I hope any deal is with something more wholesome than booze or gambling.
    2 points
  4. Yes, there must have been a reason he was a bit-part player for Aberdeen; we have just made him a much better bit-part player for us!
    1 point
  5. This partnership is vital to the creation of the podcast and contributes to the ongoing viability of the site/forum in general. As such, I'd would really appreciate people sharing this within their networks. Free free to PM for more information.
    1 point
  6. If Cinch approached Rangers about naming rights & Rangers refused I’m not sure I see the relevance in any of this.
    1 point
  7. The Eye of the Tiger, a book on the great captain, available on Amazon at £15.99 from 11 October. I can’t copy the cover illustration but check it on Amazon and you’ll see why Bobby Shearer, Tam Forsyth and Don Corleone aren’t so frightening after all.
    1 point
  8. Patience is a virtue, so they say sit back on boxing day with book and some handsome waitrose biscuits ??
    1 point
  9. Bear in mind the Court action is at the instance of Parks, not Rangers. Separate entitities. Lend credence to Timothy’s dreams. Bisgrove spent the summer hawking stadium naming rights. He reports to the Board that he can sign up some second hand car salesmen. Rangers hand in glove with cinch ‘til the SPFL lure cinch away with a better offer and Rangers, miffed, refuse to take part. So far, so good for the green dreamers Here’s the rude awakening. Bisgrove reports to the Board but Directors with significant shareholdings say no thanks, try again. Can’t see the problem but to be fair, SPFL senior counsel, Lord Keen of Elie, knows more than I do about this kind of stuff.
    1 point
  10. Worth noting, Rangers have countered suggesting cinch contacted them to discuss any opportunities and that was about the sum of it.
    1 point
  11. Looks like he ate girders for breakfast.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to London/GMT+01:00


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.