Bluedell

And Vdmar and I'm sure there was someone else more recently plus ore that I haven't noticed. . It's happened a lot and the vast majority don't bat n eyelid. I'd prefer that they didn't as I don't see the need for them to do it but it's very low down my list of priorities of how I want our players to behave.

You need to get authority from the Council to organise a march. Someone has to put their name forward to take responsibility. Presumably the UBs did not do that and when advised woud have no option than to cancel it. If they had gone ahead with it then the organisers would have likely faced charges in the same way as anyone else would if they had done it.

Living on the south side, I've come across quite a few and spoke to one recently who had been at the Ibrox game.

It's a shame you don't see any kinship with Rangers fans and feel it's OK to throw about needless insults.

It's sad when you have to insult your fellow fans to get your agenda across.

That wasn't your point.

:rfcbouncy:Merry Christmas everyone.

Did we always have the advert at the bottom of the pages? I thought that we didn't do adverts?

Does anyone know if it's worth doing on the ipad? The forum works fairly well with the bigger screen so it Tapatalk worthwhile?

You talk about the UB's statement being embarrassing? That attitude is far worse than a simple slogan at the end of a statement. You are making assumptions without any knowledge about the boy and it's frightening that you as a policeman jump to the conclusion that he was probably a major troublemaker.

Fuck off the pair of you!!!

3 posts in and you've already pissed off a moderator :fuming:

Welcome cuz!

Not for me. Won't use them and they'd just clutter up things.

We don't but they could be set up that way given the fact that RIFC will charge interest to RFC which can then be paid as dividends. Our investors have the advantage that RFC doesn't need distributable reserves and to pay the interest to RIFC and I'd reckon that Green will ensure that RIFC is fairly clean and profitable.

Perhaps that's what I'm meaning?

I think that previously the site's borders did not form part of the site so you could pull your browser in and the size of the site didn't change. Now the "wallpaper" borders do form part of the site and can't be got rid of. Not sure if that's what he means but I find it a little annoying.

Yeah, that's pretty much where I'd come from. It's been well known since they started using the term bank debt that they were doing so to exclude their preference shares which, from memory, aren't redeemable any time soon. I'm sure I've written about it a couple of times over the years. Yes Celtic pay out dividends to preference shareholders but then again it seems like our share issue may be working in exactly the same way.

Not that it's relevant but I've slagged off Usain Bolt several times for not attempting to break the world record. He has all the ability but often slows down at the end when he could keep going. The Olympic 100m final was a big anti-climax for me due to the way that he raced.

Sorry for your loss.

Didn't have a clue that there was a game on tomorrow. Thanks for highlighting it. Will pop along.

What's the deadline?

Agreed. Why give their warped views more air? All it's doing is giving them a wider audience.

I have another question about pulling out from the scheme, if you don't mind. I heard that if the share price goes up, you would only get back your initial investment. Is that the same if the share price falls?

RST members or buyrangers members?