Bluedell

I think what he did has been exaggerated and the subsequent reaction verged on hysteria.

FFS. The club was not "stolen".

So you want to ensure any cash you invest goes to a third party and not the club?

We win 2-1, I think.

Woosh. I understand your point perfectly well.

I think that you are missing the point of the article. It's about double standards.

We have had wage caps in the past. It is a sensible tool, depending on their level and how they are applied.

Yes, we do.

The club does own it. It's in the balance sheet as an asset and has been for years. It's a leasehold property. It's a long term lease of over 100 years. Business people would always talk about owning property under these conditions. I don't see that as misleading anyone.

In what way has he been economical with the truth in respect of this article?

Correct. It's just an innuendo filled article to give an excuse to those who want to have a dig at Green.

I fail to see why Rangers have to clarify something just because McMurdo hasn't done his homework properly. The cash from buying out the leasehold on the Albion will not be going to Murray. Murray owns the Edmiston. He paid for it. We have the option of buying it or not buying it. Most seem to think it's a good idea to buy it from him. What's the big deal?

If they agree to pay us all we are due then we will consider it.

Since when have the SFA or the SPL paid any attention to the rules? They could have just refused us entry if they wanted and to suggest that Green had much option other than to give into the blackmail demands is naive.

Instead of Cribari? Surely instead of Perry, who has not been impressive, although he did have a better game at the w/e (as did Cribari). I'd be in favour of considering this once we have Sandaza back and he is back to full sharpness as we are often limited by McCulloch's lack of pace.

Are you talking about this photo? The guys in the back row to the right of Green as we are looking at it are Sandy Jardine and Andrew Dickson. The guy on the left with his head turned looks like Brian Stockbridge, but can't say for sure. I sit to the other side of the directors box so don't always get a good view of who's sitting on that side.

You made an assertion and didn't give any details. I'm not a mind reader as what you're referring. Why comment? Because every time Green gets mentioned you make a negative comment and it gets tiresome. We get the fact that you don't like him.The constant negativity gets very wearing. Green gets mentioned. GS makes a negaive comment, no matter what. Repeat 100s of times. You come across as taking satisfaction if you are able to suggest that he might not have been 100% clear in what he's saying, and never give him any lattitude as to the context he says it in. There's many times that you jump to assumptions and it would be a fulltime job to show how you may be wrong or often why you actually are wrong. Plans change and situations evolve but you don't allow for that. Timetables change or aren't given but you expect everything to be done immediately or they are a "moonbeam". You just revel in the fact that something he says that he hopes to achieve hasn't yet come to fruition.

Another predictably negative response from you.

Didn't we play 4-2-3-1 yesterday?

Enron's problems were caused by the company's directors and its auditors. Nothing to do with shareholders.

What a load of rubbish.

Yes, I'm outraged. We went into administration because we couldn't pay our bills. We got the standard 10 points deduction. Why Mr Harris feels the need for the self-flagellation and the resultant redemption, attempting to justify the SPL's treatment of us is shocking!

Still don't see why people are getting their knickers in a twist over something that has nothing to do with us.

He will make a huge difference. Pace on the wing will prevent the opposition from have their 2 banks of 4 no wider than the 18 yeard box. It will give us a lot more room to stretch teams.

Is your boss still Tracy Smith?