Bluedell

Although I feel it's wrong for these penalties to stand, I could live with that.

Possibly. Strange way of saying it though. I wondered whether it was referring to sanctions. I guess we look for hidden meaning all over the place at the moment.

So what does this mean?

Regan must go.

Has that definitely been confirmed, Ian?

Thanks for the sentiments Luton but I, and many thousands of other Rangers fans, am looking forward to it. Glass half full loyal!

It's be funny if none accepted....or if they all accepted apart from Rangers.

I would much prefer the directors of the club concentrate on running the club than having to disprove every new wild theory that is produced on an almost daily basis. What's next? Prove that Peter Lawwell does not own 23% of the club? Prove that our season ticket money is not going to be donated to the SNP's independence fund? Prove that Ibrox is not going to host a Susan Boyle concert? Where does it end? One thing I can predict is that there will be a whole host of new theories after the meeting on Sunday. If people have theories then come up with the slightest bit of evidence, or else STFU!

It sounds like certain people have decided to use King as well as Brown.....

It doesn't make commercial sense for them to do that. They are not going to get the cash back through dividends and they are not venture capitalists.

No they didn't. They claimed that they were owed future income. Sorry but I don't understand what you are asking here.

So are they trying to get it from a company with which they have no relationship? They have 2 options. Whyte or Oldco.

The Ticketus deal made sense. This doesn't appear to make sense. When did they buy it? From who? Green? Can't have been D&P. Why would Ticketus buy it? They have no legal claim over newco.

The players don't give a damn who the CEO of the club is. They deal with the manager day-in, day-out and will have virtually no contact with him. It's crazy for anyone to suggest that's why any player left and there's no chance any will come back just because the owners or CEO of the club change.

If Di Stefano can't even get the Sevco company name corrct then it shows how serious he is taking it.

What happened after a ref lied. Compare and contrast Celtic's response when it's the SFA Chief Exec.

Did Brown tell you that?

Possibly not. I was being optimistic. Payroll costs could be higher, although I don't think that non-playing staff costs are anywhere near £12m if that is what you are suggesting.

Apparently they're not that good anyway?

So what do you see happening?

I was hoping that agreement was something that I imagined. I would describe clout as influence and not just finance. We obviously supply a great deal of cash to the game, but I have not seen the support influencing any decisions for a number of years, unlike others.

Welcome. Good to have another person that I disagree with here.

I don't think I have ever agreed with BP9 and that continues.... "recent events have shown that our fanbase carries clout" - I must have missed that... We don't have much strength and Celtic will continue to do everything to ensure that continues through their influence with Regan. We act all nicey, nicey and we will get nowhere. We have to fight and fight hard. It seems that BP9 has learned nothing from the events of the past few weeks.

I've got no idea. It could be that income is lower, but then again there could be opportunities for cost cutting as well...lower police costs for example.

Seems a bit optimistic, but then we don't have a team at the moment , and we aren't playing any games. Costs will probably go up from the £1m a month, but then he would know better than me.