Jump to content

 

 

bluebear54

  • Posts

    2,674
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bluebear54

  1. How about? Could you pick your best team of 11 from Rangers players since 1960 up until to today?
  2. I signed it earlier. Had a look an hour ago, it needed 4 more. EDIT: Seems they've raised the number required from 1500.
  3. Are you not entitled to see them as a shareholder, FS? In refusing they're suggesting there's something to hide. There's also the shares and any other sweeteners they got through our books mate. Doesn't include any off table ones.
  4. The statement is very good spin. No stench of Jack there. The new guy. Our danger is fans believing the spin And that we don't have a better spin doctor ourselves If we had, it would be game on
  5. I'm led to believe they've history in being smart in getting control of firms. Then asset stripping Correct me if I'm wrong anyone
  6. Different type of scam. We essentially finance their purchase of the assets. Brilliant idea For them
  7. 30,000 outside the man door with full publicity and copies of coverage to every shareholder would help.
  8. Any from the Rangers supporters over there fancy heckling him in mid stream. At the appropriate moment "you raped and pillaged the fans of a Club that means so much to so many"
  9. Andy It's not about the means of getting there. The end result is the all important thing.
  10. How, Big Chief Mountain Bear We need professionalism in our dealing with the media - and the Board. Have one guy very well briefed on his subject and he's confident that's what he there for. Spiers and the likes can be told in no uncertain terms you'll have approach person x on that subject. Your brief was to talk about x. That's why I'm here. You'll need to talk to y about subject z. You've all been well briefed about this. Kill them with the professionalism and charisma and charm that they don't have. Chris was good yesterday. Always thought David Edgar had charisma and a big future in hi heyday. Watch the good politicians to see how they go about it. Cameron, Salmond. Arguably the best in the country. They control everything. Easy enough with the right charisma and people and Great briefing.
  11. Probably thought best they didn't know about the "here's x for you x for you and the deal to Club will be a pittance, so you'll be alright Ashley. Etc, etc, etc.
  12. Ally might be subject to a confidentiality clause for all we know. If so, if he can be proved to have broken it, the Court case and fine could break him.
  13. Hi SBS This was not meant to be catty or a dig but merely you let know I Think people should post what they want on here. It's there for debate/ contra on thread reaction etc. If you don't like it you can always ignore the thread or the poster. There tends to a lot of trolling at times and it's maybe just best to ignore it. I was a wee bit suspicious of you for a while hence ignoring you. After reading a few of your posts in quotes, I did a U-turn and you're coming across loud and clear. It's meant with all the best intentions, and not looking for an excuse mate I've had a really tough couple of days at home. All the best.
  14. Brian was unplayable in the Hearts final. A performance we may never again see the likes of again. Laudrup was special - in a world context too. Supreme footballer.
  15. Quite happy for you to ignore me. Really works. Just brought you back from etherland on Tuesday. With respect and regards.
  16. Big Yorkshire hands, Ashley's and Imran's interests. Wasn't this where there was no Club lawyer there? There are no doubt more. 32 Red is scandalous. Can't wait for Daniel Stewart's time for Court. It'll come - sooner or later.
  17. We've had oodles of great enjoyable games at Hampden. Especially against them. Regarding tomorrow - I'm not going to bother watching.
  18. Thanks Zappa I think that's reassuring. In the place we find ourselves, we need all our options.
  19. Just a couple of thoughts here. Given the nature of the Beast, I agree with others that this board should not be trusted. Wouldn't be surprised if they already have a way to deal with any legal documents. This isn't like them - and they want the money. Whoever was at the meeting will know a lot more, but did DK know/was on he on conference? If not I would hope he doesn't feel marginalised. Also, with due respect, he's probably got a lot more business strategy in him than the guys on the UOF steering group. Also, Laxey scare me shitless.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.