Jump to content

 

 

trueblue 64

  • Posts

    306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by trueblue 64

  1. The money lost on non renewals of ST would have repaid both loans and left a big chunk of the 4M that is being sought.
  2. This idea of his would be better applied to newspapers, stop giving your paper money to the big nationals who spout a lot of shite and give it to local ones who seldom print guff like this.
  3. This scenario has been created by our own supporter groups as can be seen in the statement blasting Mike Ashley and all the way back to "yanks go home".
  4. Good article but the non payment of PAYE turned a lot of genuine neutrals against us. The papers did'nt help with their stories about how many nurses you can get for 9M or how many life saving operations it would buy.
  5. Chris says the 6th, your arithmetic is appalling. There is a few posters arguing about number of days but no one is arguing about Chris putting a negative slant on the contents of the review.
  6. It's not maths it's simple arithmetic. On my calender there is 19 days until the 6th counting from next Thursday.
  7. The review is due next week which gives almost 3 weeks to study it's content, ample time I would suggest. We all know irrespective of it's contents it will only take Chris minutes if not a few hours to put a negative slant on it's contents.
  8. The minority would be conned as the money they contributed would go to a cause they voted against..
  9. What would people say if a group raised money for cancer victims then gave it to drug addicts. This may be an extreme example but the principle is the same, you can't raise money for one cause then give it to another or you are conning the contributers.
  10. After the Firhill game last season at under 17 level the police will be insisting on full old firm police levels. These games have the potential to draw large crowds. The right decision IMO.
  11. There is no need to go to court over this if he was willing to remove them, but why then go and repeat them, maybe Craig fancies his chances in court.
  12. He removed the offending posts which suggests he thinks he is guilty. The fact he then repeated them suggests he is not very smart and way out his depth.
  13. Did this site sign a gagging order or did it just agree not to allow the offending words. This site chose to stay on the right side of the law, Craig intentionaly chose the confrontational route. The RFFF was not set up to protect people who choose to get on the wrong side of the law.
  14. This site chose to filter the **** word and no further action was taken, Craig could have done the same.
  15. Anything but happy about this situation. Craig should have taken the same course of action as this site and kept on the right side of the law. He only has himself to blame.
  16. Any page on the internet can be set up to bar the typing of certain words. Craig admitted he refused the gagging order.
  17. Harry Potter is shite and it's okay to state this. Try making derogatory personal comments about JK and you may find yourself in the same situation as poor Craig.
  18. Silly question as facebook is only ten years old. I never complained to my manager either. Who do you think took the correct course of action, Frankie or Craig.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.