-
Posts
13,617 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Everything posted by RANGERRAB
-
Miami investor still keen to buy stake in Rangers
RANGERRAB replied to Uilleam's topic in Rangers Chat
I’d say we are start to get things right regards are structural model i.e. the Ajax model where we develop players and sell them on. Paterson, Bassey & Aribo all sold For as long as we’re in the SPFL that will need to continue. Any outside investment will want a say in the running of the club. That could be problematic -
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Lundstram 90+1) - 1 Livingston
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Matt Ryan? -
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Lundstram 90+1) - 1 Livingston
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Their astute piece of business were those before Dr Death. Those SLAB who arranged the San giro rebuild after the bunnet never raised enough from his shares issue apologies for going off-topic -
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Lundstram 90+1) - 1 Livingston
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Perhaps he should have but don’t you think we’re pushing it a bit having a 40 year old keeper? He’s a stopgap because we never recruited properly last summer -
We need a replacement to be identified first. Did we learn nothing from the Pedro debacle?
-
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Lundstram 90+1) - 1 Livingston
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Beale ain’t coming back. big step up from Bodo/Glimt to Rangers for Knutsen. Plus what size budget would he be wanting & would he get it? -
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Lundstram 90+1) - 1 Livingston
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Was King injured? Why did he come off at HT ? -
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Lundstram 90+1) - 1 Livingston
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
I don’t see us changing our manager at the moment but the sub-standard SPFL performances can’t continue. Were too easy to play against. Our tactics and system don’t change whether it’s Livingston or Liverpool we’re playing against at home. Hopefully the manager will see sense & change the system. We play two wide players up front who don’t contribute enough. That needs to change. Id prefer 3-5-2 at home -
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Lundstram 90+1) - 1 Livingston
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Should we have had a first half penalty? When their defender handled in his own box -
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Lundstram 90+1) - 1 Livingston
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Or the manager holds up his hands and says ‘I’ll change the system ‘ -
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Lundstram 90+1) - 1 Livingston
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
You can only go on for so long playing badly & scraping results. someone has to tell the manager to change his system and tactics. Especially at home -
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Lundstram 90+1) - 1 Livingston
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Playing at home against teams that park the bus with a back4 and a holding MF player with one up front thro’ the middle with little service no longer works. -
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Lundstram 90+1) - 1 Livingston
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
If Kemar Roofe is fit then he must start tomorrow, even if we only get an hour out of him. Roofe is one player we have with a football brain in his head who can see the game in front of him. His decision-making in the final third is better than anyone else we have which is a major failing for us at the moment. Could he play the wide right role not properly filled since Candaeis left? Colak playing thro the middle -
SG supposedly wanted to buy Kevin Nisbet from hibz. Hibz asking price was £4m. The board wouldnt back the move. think they got that one right
-
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 1 (Davis 9) - 0 Dundee
RANGERRAB replied to Rousseau's topic in Rangers Chat
We simply don’t have the quality in wide areas up front that we need. Kent, Wright, Matondo, or Sakala all have been tried & done little this season. 2goals between all of them. Compare that to the yahoos with Jota, Abada, Maiden etc. -
We never learn when it comes to signing crocks. And I don’t think Souttar(if fit)would ever have been a suitable replacement for Goldson
-
I’d suggest the opposition (outside Celtic) much weaker today
-
No such thing. All different
-
Wish we had a Fintan O’Toole in Scotland to expose the Holyrood charlatans and whatever else
-
Can’t help thinking GvB is the symptom rather than the cause. I do wonder about our DoF and whether he is signing players without fully consulting the manager
-
Match Thread [FT] Motherwell 1 - 2 Rangers (Tillman 53; Lundstram 69)
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Sometimes you have to accept the points over the performance. And I agree it’s been too often this season(domestically anyway) But what we need to look at though is we’ve won 8 out of 10 SPFL league games this season. Is that really justification for sacking a manager? The CL is another matter altogether. I think it’s wishful thinking to believe we can compete on our transfer budget in the group we were drawn in -
The academy is a lottery. It is no guarantee of producing future players for the first team. Same at every club. A good global scouting network is a greater priority
-
Match Thread [FT] Motherwell 1 - 2 Rangers (Tillman 53; Lundstram 69)
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Got there in the end. In all honesty I’d have taken any victory today after Wednesday’s thrashing. Surely I’m not the only one who can see real issues with that team & certain players in it -
Match Thread [FT] Motherwell 1 - 2 Rangers (Tillman 53; Lundstram 69)
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
If we play both Matondo and Kent we need a lot more from them in the final third. -
Match Thread [FT] Motherwell 1 - 2 Rangers (Tillman 53; Lundstram 69)
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Let’s wait & see then. I think he disappears for long spells during games