Danny

Having had a really good look at all of them, he's the best of a bad bunch. But he's not long term surely.

If you all feel so strongly about this, and clearly you do, maybe it's best to erase all the 'bickering' so the thread can get back on track? Just a thought.

It kept me awake, so I wrote a blog about it... Ibrox Noise: For Sale: Rangers FC. Several Previous Careless Owners. Having looked at all the options, do you agree with my conclusions so far?

Because in real time the video showed there was no contact. Yes, he was made an example of, and yes, quite possibly he became a scapegoat, but if this had been a Celtic player, there's not a poster here who would have defended him.

Yes you are. If you really didn't care you wouldn't have spent all this time replying to me. All organisations respond when criticised. Opening hours are Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm. I never got involved with this part of the debate - I simply pointed out your raison d'etre is to defend Dingwall and the RST. I've not called you a single name. I described you as a sycophant, and Dingwall's mouthpiece, but these were hardly namecalling. If you're that sensitive, the Internet is not for you.

I can't speak for rugby. At all. You mean many of you are looking for the grey to justify the act? No they didn't. They were entirely inconclusive. No, he dived. No contact, dive. I've seen it many times, and I've not seen one piece of evidence to show me there was undeniable contact.

BBC had 5 bids. Said a statement was forthcoming from admin regarding it all.

What would you expect from Gersnet? A nanny state where criticism is banned? Then stop acting like one! I wasn't implying it, I stated it literally. You mean about Dingwall/RST/SaveRangers, right... It does, yes. I have nothing against you personally, you're just someone with their opinions and apparent campaign - it just so happens they clash entirely with my beliefs and in such a circumstance, you'll vehement defend what you feel you have to, just as I will criticise what I feel I have to.

I think it's fair that TB makes a very cutting post regarding something I've been discussing with Cal, who has been an outspoken commentator on the same issue. I don't see anything shit stirring about wanting to know his views on a post which focuses on the same discussion.

Of course, I'm not interested in what he had to say, and I felt the urge to say so. Not sure entirely how I'm attention seeking in the slightest, but feel free to hold that view if you wish. That literally makes no sense in this context.

If you didn't whore off the RST at every turn like some sycophant, I might even take you seriously. It's like you're Dingwall's mouthpiece and do nothing but defend him and his organisation.

The RST and an Australian attention seeker. There's so much in this post that I'm not interested in.

A wee quote from them. Not sure when it was made.

I await Calscot with his objections. Good post TB.

A total attention seeker who achieved his aim of lots of fawning from Rangers fans online. I was flabbergasted at how many people were hero worshipping a guy who was only claiming he'd give £1M to the club. And to answer your question, not a fucking million anyway! Not if the current figure is anything to go by.

£100k is not bad. I'm going to go for around the 500k mark tops that this will hit.

http://www.club9sports.com/ Apparently that's the website of the consortium. I think.

Well let's see what Americans own English clubs and if they've destroyed them. Villa, Lerner. He's very rich and they do make astute signings. And they're healthy. Utd - shambolic takeover which made fans dislike them. Who else is there?

He cheated. Sorry, but he dived 100%. Still think Conroy's being castigated, and I don't blame him for resigning from the farce that is the SFA. But Aluko went down. If it had been a tim player we'd all be calling said player a total cheat (and being appalled at the SFA letting him away with it, but that's another matter). So let's not lie to ourselves - there was literally no contact and he dived. Not quite as bad as Drogba's cheating last night, but simulation is a vile component of football.

SSN have it that some Chicago based consortium is launching a bid to buy us. I'd take that. Hope they have money. And lots of it.

Still is from Vanguard Bears, last time I was on it.

Still is from Vanguard Bears, last time I was on it.

I know polls don't matter, but one's on RM asking whether punters want the Blue Knights. 86 say yes, without Ticketus involved. 26 say yes, with Ticketus involved. 214 want someone else entirely.

As an aside, his buy out clause is about £230M. That's his value.

I feel like I posted this a few times, but it's got the wrong name next to it