Danny

Touchscreen EEEE AWWW! Plus, by work perfectly did it scroll down properly? Or give you the phone's own text editor when you inputted. Or did it strut its funky stuff and do a fandago with a large chicken?

I'd hit the thanks button but alas, there isn't one. So I'll say it instead, thanks

tbh I wouldn't use a touchscreen phone if you paid me. They're all that way nowadays aren't they?

Sfa could use a cleanout of protocol, personnel and policy. Of that there's no doubt.

Ah, it was you who tweeted that Our Mr Regan clearly dislikes being questioned on anything.

I've always had a problem with this whole 'hun' thing. I don't personally find it that offensive in the way I'd find OB offensive. I also don't entirely feel it's bigoted any more than tim is. OB and fenian for me are the two terms which stink of bigotry, tim and hun don't strike me as the same level at all. I also don't expect Regan to be looking at all the tweets of these users to establish whether or not he's communicating with a bigot. Like you say Chris, he's not replying to bigoted comments - but you seem to be making an assumption that he's aware of the use of the word 'hun' being made by people to other Tweeter. I'm not defending him, I think the SFA has been a quite abysmal organisation since the days of Farry, and I wouldn't be shocked if Regan is part of the problem. I'm just not sure your blog, well compiled though it is, proves a stain on his character.

Change them to 'this post is by Danny' and 'this post sucks'.

Don't think it's available for my phone which is a slightly older Nokia N95 effort.

Basically the text input field is a set size on screen. When you reach the size limit, instead of the top line of your text disappearing up (being pushed up) and you being able to see the next line down at the bottom and so on, the next line goes behind the bottom of the input field so you can't see what the ruddy hell you're typing. That probably makes fuck all sense. A comparison would be Facebook mobile. It gives you the text field to enter your comment, but when you access it it actually gives you your phone's own text editor, meaning you're not limited to the size of the Facebook text field. I'm explaining it really badly, but did this make any sense? And never heard of Tapatalk?

Zero problem with this being investigated - it was a dive and it should be reprimanded as such. But the discrepancy that other similar cases don't always get hauled up is a little disquieting.

Wylde, aluko, and edu were our best players. The latter even got forward more than usual.

Kudos on installing the software but is there any way to allow the text input box to scroll down when full so you can see what you're typing when you go past the size limit!?

Forum's operating well at the moment. Whatever you may have done has worked for now Frankie

I still remain surprised by the sudden turnaround in opinion in the last 2 weeks about Edu.

If you won enough you could buy the club entirely!

Don't choose Ortiz's jersey number, that's a guaranteed fail.

I think it literally boils down to our financial troubles and the Villarreal grass (which started the whole sectarian nonsense). We've been an easier target for a while, but back in the day (especially 9iar) there was almost no negative Rangers stories and constant attacks on Celtic. That was before McCann saved them - during a time when they were an easy target and close to collapse. I don't deny there are partisan journalists who do not like Rangers, just like in any walk of life. It's just that Rangers stories are also easier and lazier these days. It seems to me whichever club is in a stronger structural state gets less attacks - just us during 9iar and the John Barnes/Venglos era.

The same paper who printed the cracked Celtic crest back in the day? The same paper tims call the Daily Ranger? This paper cannot be biased against both. Or maybe it can. Maybe it sees a story and uses it to sell papers. Whoever it targets.

I heard this defence of Beattie back in the day when I said the same thing about him. It was all about 'match fitness' 'needs a run' 'give him a chance'. When it was plain as day to me that this was a signing who simply didn't fit in. Who wasn't the right kind of player for us. Quite frankly, I expect to be proven correct on this occasion as well, and I 100% expect, if that indeed happens, that yourself, Darthter and Dutchy all admit he was a bad signing.

I feel like you're ignoring almost everything I'm saying and taking wee small bits out of context in order to disagree with them I have nothing against Whyte, but he is the owner of the club I support and questions have been asked about his business integrity. I am not going to blindly have faith in him and ask no questions. Anyone who does might be in for some substantial disappointment. Erm, because the club only confirmed it today?! It was only strong speculation until it was announced by us. You can't investigate speculation Allan!

The problem is your post makes a lot of assumptions. It basically depends on 'if' a lot. And it's dangerous to make assertions based on nothing more than hope and conjecture. That's not a dig at you, a lot of fans will agree with your post and I'm not exactly far off myself, but it's folly to assume these 'ifs' will actually come to fruition.

I find this confusing. If he saw the club as a business opportunity, then you have to question his business acumen. There is little to no profit in Scottish football, and someone who takes over any club here has to accept, like in most countries, that they'll be lucky to break even regarding turnover. So if that's why he took us over, to make money, then ignoring the mercenary nature of that claim, it seems a financially odd thing to do. There are other businesses far more suited to profit and growth than football.

I don't necessarily expect them to do anything as it were, nor do I personally care about what Whyte has admitted doing, so long as it doesn't affect the health of Rangers. But the fact is that if what he's done warrants investigation from the powers that be, it doesn't seem unfair to me. If it was the Celtic chairman with all these accusations being made against him, Scottish football would expect him to be investigated as well. I expect little to come of it, but I'm not buying a conspiracy theory on the fact they're investigating.

With all due respect, if he has broken rules should it just be left alone?

You did. I was replying to Allan.