simplythebest 0 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 You're comparing apples with oranges and again totally ignoring my point - wilfully or not. Do it again and the ban hammer will fall. I'll assume the last bit is a joke? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 Watch this and weep. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/scotland/27146301 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,182 Posted April 24, 2014 Author Share Posted April 24, 2014 Is that a rule? I remember Green was barely getting paid anything when he came back as a consultant albeit briefly in the end. I absolutely want scouting to be sorted out but that isn't going to happen without ST money is it, and i'm sure we all accept it wasn't Wallace that spent all the other cash. That was a PR stunt when it come to Green and we all know how good a decision that was. I'm struggling to stop laughing here. Just to be clear, as a football only fan, you want scouting sorted out BUT if we can only afford scouting or another PR firm you'd rather the PR firm was appointed first? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,182 Posted April 24, 2014 Author Share Posted April 24, 2014 I'll assume the last bit is a joke? No. I expect people to debate properly and you seem to be unable to discuss some issues correctly which goes against the rules and spirit of the forum. There's nothing worse than folk misrepresenting what others say while deflecting from the point at hand. You've done it twice now. Take it as a polite warning. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 That was a PR stunt when it come to Green and we all know how good a decision that was. I'm struggling to stop laughing here. Just to be clear, as a football only fan, you want scouting sorted out BUT if we can only afford scouting or another PR firm you'd rather the PR firm was appointed first? Did I say that? I'm simply not going to get hung up on a consultancy appointment who i've got no idea what the wage even is. Thing is if it's more months down the line and we've got little progress on our long term future I'll probably be right behind you in all this, I just think people are jumping to all this far too early. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 we would be the first company in history to go bust with investment totaling double our turnover sitting waiting and being refused by the board thats for sure. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 Did I say that? I'm simply not going to get hung up on a consultancy appointment who i've got no idea what the wage even is. Thing is if it's more months down the line and we've got little progress on our long term future I'll probably be right behind you in all this, I just think people are jumping to all this far too early. so 24 months of inaction etc hasn't been enough. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 so 24 months of inaction etc hasn't been enough. Different board... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,182 Posted April 24, 2014 Author Share Posted April 24, 2014 Did I say that? I'm simply not going to get hung up on a consultancy appointment who i've got no idea what the wage even is. Thing is if it's more months down the line and we've got little progress on our long term future I'll probably be right behind you in all this, I just think people are jumping to all this far too early. That's what it read for me and you're certainly struggling to clarify your opinion. As it stands, instead of a scouting department, we have various PR people employed at what I'd fancy is a very generous sum of money. This week a new PR professional was appointed in favour of a new chief scout. Is that good or bad management from those running the club? As a football-only fan does that make you confident about the quality of signing ahead of the new season? If not, can you now see why some football subjects automatically intertwine with boardroom decisions? It's just one example - but I'm sure we could pick out more to show why not every criticism of the boardroom comes down to political viewpoints. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 No. I expect people to debate properly and you seem to be unable to discuss some issues correctly which goes against the rules and spirit of the forum. There's nothing worse than folk misrepresenting what others say while deflecting from the point at hand. You've done it twice now. Take it as a polite warning. you want scouting sorted out BUT if we can only afford scouting or another PR firm you'd rather the PR firm was appointed first? Was that not misrepresenting what I said? And when it comes to some things I am likely talking in a general sense about fans rather than necessarily directing it right at you. The big issue here is me being in a minority of one, if i'm going to be banned for that then not much I can do. Sure plenty on here would celebrate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.