Frankie 8,150 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Frankly couldn't care if the board, team management or playing staff are Rangers men or not. It's how they perform that matters. And their performance is questionable while trying to hide legally available documents from shareholders and actual Rangers fans. Who is disloyal again? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 It's hard to believe that anyone can read this story and think, 'Nosy bastard!!' rather than clutch their hands tightly over their heads, squat down in despair, and hop up and down on the kitchen floor going 'Noooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!' 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,150 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 It's hard to believe that anyone can read this story and think, 'Nosy bastard!!' rather than clutch their hands tightly over their heads, squat down in despair, and hop up and down on the kitchen floor going 'Noooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!' It's fascinating that some people will strongly criticise the complainant when the defender has admitted culpability despite saying they have nothing to hide from fans. This is typical of the online debate surrounding Rangers. Some people will not concede ground on any subject no matter how ridiculous their argument may appear. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 It's fascinating that some people will strongly criticise the complainant when the defender has admitted culpability despite saying they have nothing to hide from fans. This is typical of the online debate surrounding Rangers. Some people will not concede ground on any subject no matter how ridiculous their argument may appear. You're going to have your work cut out shortly moderating things because they're bound to get personal, they always do. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 If only you knew exactly who he was! Even I can work it out, and that's saying something. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real PapaBear 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 You're going to have your work cut out shortly moderating things because they're bound to get personal, they always do. To be fair, I have been very pleasantly surprised at the continued level of debate. So far we've managed to have diamatrically opposing views about something we all care passionately about and the vitriol and insult has been remarkable by its absense. Well done, us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 To be fair, I have been very pleasantly surprised at the continued level of debate. So far we've managed to have diamatrically opposing views about something we all care passionately about and the vitriol and insult has been remarkable by its absense. Well done, us. Was that an indirect complement?! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,150 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 To be fair, I have been very pleasantly surprised at the continued level of debate. So far we've managed to have diamatrically opposing views about something we all care passionately about and the vitriol and insult has been remarkable by its absense. Well done, us. This is how it should be. No-one is saying everyone has to agree but disagree respectfully and debate honestly. It always amazes me when people resort to insult, abuse and trolling. It's only then problems start and, for the most part, it's the same people guilty of it. At least on this forum we're free of them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Disagreeing with him going to the newspapers is hardly libel surely, not that i'm an expert. Claiming he went to the papers is both a downright lie and a libel. As for breaking the law, that sort of accusation has been thrown about a few times like with auto renewals so i'll take it with a pinch of salt. It is not an accusation it is a fact that the law was broken the minute he was refused an inspection of the contracts on the spurious excuse of "legal advice" it cannot now be unbroken. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Real PapaBear 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Was that an indirect complement?! it was a direct compliment to those who deserve it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.