Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Can you prove beyond doubt they have broken the law ? Of course they have, companies act 2006, section 229. Why do you think they are scrambling after plod asked? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Mr Wallace last Friday was busy telling the whole world it was no one's business what he earned. At best that was out and out bullshit worst a coniving lie born out of greed and self preservation. He's either ignorant of the law or thinks we are fools. Well done to bill for exposing Wallace again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Mr Wallace last Friday was busy telling the whole world it was no one's business what he earned. At best that was out and out bullshit worst a coniving lie born out of greed and self preservation. He's either ignorant of the law or thinks we are fools. Well done to bill for exposing Wallace again. We never found out what McCoist earned until the accounts 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Mr Wallace last Friday was busy telling the whole world it was no one's business what he earned. At best that was out and out bullshit worst a coniving lie born out of greed and self preservation. In fairness, disclosing contractual details to the public/media etc is completely different to a shareholder viewing the contract documents etc. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 I knew he was going, at some point, because it was on this forum last week. Given the legal eye which Mr Easdale keeps on Rangers fan mesageboards, they can't claim they didn't know. And bluntly, even if someone turned up with the most obnoxious attitude known to man and a posse of lads wearing Trilby hats with 'press' in the hatband at his heels, it still wouldn't excuse breaking the law. I'd love a Trilby hat. Ah, the class of yesteryear. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 We never found out what McCoist earned until the accounts After Allys best attempts to keep it hidden? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 We never found out what McCoist earned until the accounts As shareholders we have no legal right to know the terms of his contract that is not the case in regards to Directors contracts though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 As shareholders we have no legal right to know the terms of his contract that is not the case in regards to Directors contracts though. Since the contracts were made available in the end do we know what's in them yet? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 Does the shareholder have to sign anything about disclosure before viewing ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 30, 2014 Share Posted April 30, 2014 We never found out what McCoist earned until the accounts Nor so we have an legal right to. No idea why that's relevant. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.