RANGERRAB 3,259 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 No idea but We have an investment group at the club and according to the board in court under oath no less we have promised investment. Plus dave king offering to deliver 50 million over 3 years. Investment seems a simple think to deliver. you still don't believe the nonsense that DK is going to invest £50m do you ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 you still don't believe the nonsense that DK is going to invest £50m do you ? I don't believe the board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 you still don't believe the nonsense that DK is going to invest £50m do you ? Rab, you are becoming very very repetitive. Could you please change the record? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,151 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 rangers must be the only club anywhere who have so-called supporters are actively seeking to destroy it.......... Not so. The club have said they can cope with low renewals via investment. Such investment and the indication of better management throughout the business would enable fans to make their own financial input without worry. Instead 20,000 people at least remain concerned enough to hold back. That says more about the club management than supporters who have previously been incredibly committed. It's a shame some would rather criticise their own rather than people who have previously shown little attachment to Rangers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,151 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 you still don't believe the nonsense that DK is going to invest £50m do you ? Nonsense from King or not, we're continually told the club will secure similar levels of new funding but nothing has happened. Why is that? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,151 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 I agree with all of that. However I am at a loss to see where change is going to come from. It is not the individuals on the board that need to change entirely, it is the power behind the throne that needs changing. That only changes with buying them out, and nobody has the money coupled with the desire to do so. In an ideal world we could have a Dave King/ Jim McColl type guy with the ability to buy the powerful shareholders out now, and then ask the fans to fund a new share issue to get us back to the top. With a proper board in place full of respected businessmen like Wallace (or the chap from Dundee we tried to get before)but without the binds, the fans could finally put this decade of hell behind us and move forward with the focus ON the pitch. Isn't McColl free from his business obligations to come back to the table in a proper financial sense next year? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,259 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 I agree with all of that. However I am at a loss to see where change is going to come from. It is not the individuals on the board that need to change entirely, it is the power behind the throne that needs changing. That only changes with buying them out, and nobody has the money coupled with the desire to do so. In an ideal world we could have a Dave King/ Jim McColl type guy with the ability to buy the powerful shareholders out now, and then ask the fans to fund a new share issue to get us back to the top. With a proper board in place full of respected businessmen like Wallace (or the chap from Dundee we tried to get before)but without the binds, the fans could finally put this decade of hell behind us and move forward with the focus ON the pitch. Neither McColl or King are prepared to buy out existing shareholders. Let's move on 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,315 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 Neither McColl or King are prepared to buy out existing shareholders. Let's move on move on where Rab? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 move on where Rab? Together as one mate. As Rangers. Give this board another set of accounts to see how they have shaped the business post "one off/purchase/IPO costs" and see if they are able to run us properly. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 My worry would be we don't have the time to do that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.