aweebluesoandso 290 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 track record in the epl. really. and how are we to afford that? it will be the cheapest option humanly possible and ashley probably wont know or care who it is. We won't, Ashley will if he's serious about wanting his onerous contract to remain very profitable (up to date). He can just as easily replace Aly with some nondescript journeyman manager, either way it will tip his hand as to how this shambles is going to pan out. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 track record in the epl. really. and how are we to afford that? it will be the cheapest option humanly possible and ashley probably wont know or care who it is. Just remember when we were in the 3rd div and McCoist was on circa £800,000 , Laudrup was on £500,000 at Swansea , someone like Tony Pulis would jump at the chance of managing us , personally I want someone with no connection to us at all , I absolutely despair at the "he must be a Rangers man " pish , its Rangers men that got us on this mess 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 I think at this moment in time, it will be someone from England with ties to Ashley or with a proven track record in the EPL. Ashley has to get this right or the support decline will continue unabated. Assuming of course Ashley actually gives a monkey's f@ck? Which up till now he has shown a remarkable dereliction in a duty of care. for a supposed shrewd business man. He's been very shrewd. He's got what he wanted at no cost. He's got no duty of care to show dereliction towards. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hildy 0 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 For quite some time, there has been a clique of Rangers fans who have been keen to see Billy Davies in the job. To them, no-one is as good as their beloved Billy. This is just one of several reasons why we should look elsewhere. Davies would be a divisive appointment. While some would welcome him and tolerated him probably beyond reason, others would be disapproving and in some cases, horrified, if he got the gig. Would Forest fans want him back? Would Derby fans want him back? Would he have Rangers playing in a more expansive way? For a large number of fans, Davies would be a very unwelcome choice as the next Rangers manager. Anyone critical of Ally who is happy to settle for Davies is not putting the best interests of Rangers to the fore. Let's advertise and see who is attracted to the job. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 He's been very shrewd. He's got what he wanted at no cost. He's got no duty of care to show dereliction towards. He;s been that shrewd he's let a prime asset go to rack and ruin, even paying a pittance for us he;s spectacularly took his eye off the ball up here imo. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted December 14, 2014 Author Share Posted December 14, 2014 Let's advertise and see who is attracted to the job. Fully agree, we should have done that when Wattie left not give the job to someone because their there. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 It will be the cheapest option, we are skint. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 He;s been that shrewd he's let a prime asset go to rack and ruin, even paying a pittance for us he;s spectacularly took his eye off the ball up here imo. I don;t think he sees it that way, nor cares much one way or another 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 I don;t think he sees it that way, nor cares much one way or another This is what i don't understand why get involved then? in the grand scheme of thing his onerous contract with us brings in tiny fraction in percentage of SD overall profits. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 This is what i don't understand why get involved then? in the grand scheme of thing his onerous contract with us brings in tiny fraction in percentage of SD overall profits. You don't get to be a billionaire by ignoring easy millions. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.