der Berliner 3,240 Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 As Zappa previously hinted at, the website could as easily have been updated perfectly using the latest outdated information provided by the NOMAD. The media department has been ripped to shreds, IIRC. Someone's got to update all the websites every now and then ... it's not that hard to understand? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,240 Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 Can you supply a magnyfying glass with it. Hold CTRL and push the "+" key. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 If Easdale has voting rights over 21,304,505 shares, and only owns 4,242,110 himself and BP & Marg have a combined 7,026,485 this is only 11,268,595 in total. So whose shares does he also have proxies for, given that the total number of these proxies must total 10,035,910. If such a number existed under any significant ownership, surely the owners would have to be listed? Are we to believe that he has proxies amounting to over 12% of the total share capital and they are all in under 3% bundles? Is it possible that a lot of those shares have been sold, (or were never there in the first place!) and this is another "honest mistake" by NOMAD(s) over the period? Is there any way the NOMAD or Easdale can be forced to issue publicly a full list of who he holds proxies for? It doesnt seem to add up to me. We have to assume that a large chunk of the remaining proxies held by Easdale are basically a bunch of GreenCo's original 'investors' such as Glenmuir, Norne Anstalt, Putney Holdings, Eurovestech, Gorbon Limited, Asia Credit Corporation and Insight IM. Those companies originally got a combined total of about 6.5m shares and are probably still hidden behind the largest shareholder, Beaufort Nominees who as of a couple of months ago still held 18,391,569 shares, most of which are the ones Easdale holds the proxies for. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 Hold CTRL and push the "+" key. Yes tried that but still not very clear. I always do it with control and mouse scroll works the same. Maybe I need new glasses. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 (edited) Here's a wee snippet from an actual FULL shareholder list dated 10/11/14. I've highlighted Beaufort Nominees (aka GreenCo/BPH/Margarita/Easdale etc etc) and blocked out the surrounding names & addresses so I don't get into soapy bubble. http://i.imgur.com/2jnHRaj.png Edited January 18, 2015 by Zappa 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 Seen this on Twiter.... Hopefully Magath and Ian Hart can get added to the anti-board column, and perhaps even Nash and Crighton. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 Are we sure that Easdale's proxies are still at the same level? Perhaps some of them have sold up? I'm hoping that the above diagram has some level of double-counting in respect of the proxies. One thing that we can say for sure is that it is going to be close. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudbertz 0 Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 I thought Magath was already confirmed to be with the good guys, who did he meet with in Glasgow a few weeks back? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 Are we sure that Easdale's proxies are still at the same level? Perhaps some of them have sold up? I'm hoping that the above diagram has some level of double-counting in respect of the proxies. One thing that we can say for sure is that it is going to be close. A notice would have to be filed every time a per cent is crossed either way regarding the Easdale proxy iirc. I most definitely wouldn't count Hart's votes in the anti-board column but would for Crighton and Nash. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 I know Hart was a Greenite but had hoped he'd switched as he's a fan. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.