Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Making some assumptions, have the good guys got 44.85% in the bag? Dave King 14.57% George Taylor 9.30% Douglas Park 6.14% George Letham 4.05% Rangers First 1.72% Rangers Supporters Trust 1.56% Lynchwood Nominees Limited 1.48% Kieran Prior 1.35% Ally McCoist 1.34% Felix Magath 0.99% Hargreaves Lansdown Stockbrokers Limited 0.68% Vanguard Bears + proxies 0.44% Rock Nominees Limited 0.34% Redmayne (Nominees) Limited 0.27% Malcolm Murray 0.25% Colin Howell 0.25% Norman Crighton 0.12% Are VB voting for the good guys? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 (edited) Are VB voting for the good guys? I presume that they would vote for the current board to be removed, although perhaps it's a big assumption on my part that they would vote for King. Does anyone know what the VB's thoughts are? Edited February 17, 2015 by Bluedell 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Dynamo 128 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Im guessing they have the same number of shares, rather than having joint shares, if thats what you mean. Tis a guess mind. Figured that, though it seems a bizarre way to list it 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,148 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 I presume that they would vote for the current board to be removed, although perhaps it's a big assumption on my part that they would vote for King. Does anyone know what the VB's thoughts are? I can only go by social media and official VB statements and I think it's likely they'll vote for the removal of board members but perhaps not the appointment of new ones. As I've found out over the years though, it's difficult to try and second guess VB. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted February 17, 2015 Share Posted February 17, 2015 Chris Graham @ChrisGraham76 · 51m51 minutes ago To confirm for those asking about Graeme Henderson. Local businessman and 100% bluenose. Vote will go with the fans and nominee directors. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,409 Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 Does anyone seriously think DK would be trying to get control of Rangers if Whyte still had involvement ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabiDuck 89 Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 Given the query about VB, sorry if this has been addressed before, but what happens in the event that the existing board members are voted out and the proposed new members are all rejected, are we left with no directors or does the incumbent stay in place? Given that the vote may well be very close, the VB situation (and others likeminded) may lead us into this position... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,239 Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 Regarding the graphic above ... it states that Sevco 5088 "bought the assets of the club oldco while in administration". Isn't that Whyte's fiction rather than fact? Sevco Scotland Ltd. bought the assets and was then renamed, the admins first agreed to sell the assets to Sevco 5088, entering a legally binding agreement, that was obviously later changed. I would assume that the admis were in power to change these legally binding agreements as they see fit, if both parties - seller & buyer - agree to that? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 18, 2015 Share Posted February 18, 2015 Does anyone seriously think DK would be trying to get control of Rangers if Whyte still had involvement ? Whytes claim won't affect rangers. On the surface at least he appears to have a great case against green. Sevco 5088 had abinding agreement to buy the assets. Green admits whyte was sevco 5088 and tha he conned whyte. These are things we know for a fact. Green better have some evidence he had permission from whyte to transfer the asset sale. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.