SteveC 150 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 (edited) So we have MW on Friday saying - repeatedly - that he'd love to know where the leaks were coming from and now DK saying that the Board weren't leaking (though admittedly here on one issue rather than the ones MW talked about). I suspect both sides were and that the telling thing is that we had two sides instead of one team one working together. Edited February 11, 2017 by SteveC 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 That statement doesn't add up for so many different reasons. It is shameful how much of a laughing stock Rangers have become. It really is - the likes of Sutton, Collymore and English are revelling in our embarrassment. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,410 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Presumably because somewhat foolishly it had not been confirmed in writing up to that point in time. This is a distinct weakness in the Club's version of events. "Immediately terminated", but the fellow thus despatched did not know? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,411 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 It seems everyone is lying and leaking stories to the press!, meanwhile we fans have just to pick a side and hope for the best!, just keep buying a ST and take what you get! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 "Immediately terminated", but the fellow thus despatched did not know? After discussion. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Does your mate know that the source of leaks was the boardroom, or has he made that assumption? Surely even clowns like Jackson & Co will keep quiet about who their informant actually is? No he knows who the stories came from , it's part of his job to protect his employers , you can't just make shit up , even in Scotland lol 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 "Immediately terminated", but the fellow thus despatched did not know? Plus not only was he taking training , he was taking press conferences and doing stunts for Rangers TV , it doesn't add up , I smell shite 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 It really is - the likes of Sutton, Collymore and English are revelling in our embarrassment. Yeah but these two have no credibility. Every other pundit or media station is simply wondering what is going on. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little General 80 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Plus not only was he taking training , he was taking press conferences and doing stunts for Rangers TV , it doesn't add up , I smell shite Are you suggesting Warburton didn't resign as Warburton has suggested? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 After discussion. Quite so. It would appear that the said discussion took 4+ days and the "immediate termination" only took place in the changed circumstances thereafter. The statement begs the question of what would have happened if the agent had not gone back on Thursday because it would appear that up to that point the employments had not been terminated. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.