Problems at Ibrox....

[buster. 4,808]

1 minute ago, alskoosher said:

This motion is unstarred and held in chambers not court, the perception is that since it is a request for interdict TOP are requesting that king be brought to court in person to answer his contempt of that same court and the Law Lords ruling.

Whose perception,.....The Huddleboard, The Rangers Monitor ?

Edited May 1, 2018 by buster.

[ranger_syntax 3,767]

1 minute ago, alskoosher said:

By success, no ?

 

You will need to be more specific than that.

[alskoosher 14]

Just now, buster. said:

Whose perception,.....The Huddleboard ?

The perception of what an interdict is and whom it protects, the TOP made it perfectly clear that they would take all measures to ensure compliance, after king failed to comply with the order.

[alskoosher 14]

2 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said:

 

You will need to be more specific than that.

Should be specific enough Txiki Begiristain

[buster. 4,808]

Just now, alskoosher said:

The perception of what an interdict is and whom it protects, the TOP made it perfectly clear that they would take all measures to ensure compliance, after king failed to comply with the order.

Is it your opinion or is it what you said "...the perception is..." ?

 

 

[ranger_syntax 3,767]

4 minutes ago, alskoosher said:

Should be specific enough Txiki Begiristain

So you don't have a way to measure the success of a director of football.

 

But you're certain you don't want Mark Allen because he doesn't pass your non-existent test.

 

[alskoosher 14]

So you think Txiki isn't a measure of success, how novel.

[alskoosher 14]

12 minutes ago, buster. said:

Is it your opinion or is it what you said "...the perception is..." ?

 

 

No it isn't my opinion, interdicts are sought to enforce the protection of the rights of those affected by the miscreants actions, also to enforce the consequences of not complying with a court order, amazing how many think king is above the law in any country. 

[buster. 4,808]

Just now, alskoosher said:

No it isn't my opinion, interdicts are sought to enforce the protection of the rights of those affected by the miscreants actions, also to enforce the consequences of not complying with a court order, amazing how many think king is above the law in any country. 

So when you wrote  "...the perception is..."

Whose perception is it or where exactly did you come accross it ?

 

Given, there are many tens of thousands of legal experts that have sprung up in the west of Scotland in recent years.

[alskoosher 14]

2 minutes ago, buster. said:

So when you wrote  "...the perception is..."

Whose perception is it or where exactly did you come accross it ?

 

Given, there are many tens of thousands of legal experts that have sprung up in the west of Scotland in recent years.

I didn't come across it we use it every day or most days.You will be wiser soon enough, I have no intention of getting into any argument about a clear breach of a court order by king, he has consequences to face.