Jump to content

 

 

The Summer 2018 Transfer Window Rumours and Deals


Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, DMAA said:

Well from a quick google of “football target man” all the articles that come up refer to strong aerial ability. I’d say the likes of Lafferty are semi-target men, or poor men’s target men who can do the link up play side of things but aren’t going to win as many knock-downs, flick ons etc as you would expect from a quality target man like Prso. 

I'm not saying they shouldn't have strong aerial ability -- it's patently preferable -- just that they don't have to, to be a target man. 

 

Lukaku, Lewandowski, Aguero, Higuain, Rooney (for like a season...) are/were all target men -- amongst other things -- that are/were not particularly great in the air, or it's not their strength -- we are talking about high level players, so they're deficient in few things.  

 

Going back to Laffterty and Sadiq, they are used as target men. Sadiq's video's show a lot of runs in behind, but he's also the focal point of the attack. Hearts used Lafferty as a target man too: that goal against Celtic came as a result of a long pass into him, which he laid off. They are a physical presence, and a focal point for their teams. That's a target man to me. 

 

I agree they're not Prso level quality in the air -- that would cost a few bob! :D 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's someone to play alongside Morelos, the key is to identify Freddo's weaker areas ie. in the air, then try to get someone who can complement and balance out his skill set.

 

You then bring in another "all rounder", that can provide backup to both the other players.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

I'm not saying they shouldn't have strong aerial ability -- it's patently preferable -- just that they don't have to be a target man. 

 

Lukaku, Lewandowski, Aguero, Higuain, Rooney (for like a season...) are/were all target men -- amongst other things -- that are/were not particularly great in the air, or it's not their strength -- we are talking about high level players, so they're deficient in few things.  

 

Going back to Laffterty and Sadiq, they are used as target men. Sadiq's video's show a lot of runs in behind, but he's also the focal point of the attack. Hearts used Lafferty as a target man too: that goal against Celtic came as a result of a long pass into him, which he laid off. They are a physical presence, and a focal point for their teams. That's a target man to me. 

 

I agree they're not Prso level quality in the air -- that would cost a few bob! :D 

It probably hinges on style of play. With the modern styles of play out there today the target man role is probably less and less reliant on aerial ability. In a side who play a direct style of football I’d say aerial ability would be as important an attribute as any for him to have.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DMAA said:

It probably hinges on style of play. With the modern styles of play out there today the target man role is probably less and less reliant on aerial ability. In a side who play a direct style of football I’d say aerial ability would be as important an attribute as any for him to have.

 

Yes, I agree.

 

Maybe I've got a modern conception of a target man, that's intertwined with the role/style of play? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, craig said:

I log in to 3 pages of wondering if you need to be tall, strong or good in the air..... and nothing on transfer rumours :(

 

Just call me ian or dB :D

I blame the podcast for filling Steve's (4LHAD) head with youtube fame and taking his eye of the rumour ball :whistle: :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Colour of the shorts reminds me of our 'Lovat' uniform in the Marines.

 

Whilst there, the young lad on loan from Liverpool should be down doing 100 press-ups for having his hands in his pockets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tannochsidebear said:

Very interesting to note that all of training kit has no manufacturer branding on it at all. It looks quite retro!

 

42 man squad including backroom staff. Thats an awfully high wage bill!

I would assume that it never really have been any less people, only that we don't see and hear much of the backroom staff folk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.