Frankie 8,151 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Going by the commentary from various folk on Twitter it seems the quality of questions this year was incredibly bad. It's good news about the disabled facilities but not much clarity on any other serious issues that we've discussed of late. At least we'll have club football to talk about again over the coming week. Just in time for a raft of postponements for the forecast Baltic weather... 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sutton_blows_goats 4,207 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 9 minutes ago, Frankie said: Going by the commentary from various folk on Twitter it seems the quality of questions this year was incredibly bad. Incredible that some people wanted to ask about lack of rangers Rubber Ducks for sale or Stadium closure during COVID instead of hot topics like the constant barrage of legal cases, or the ange homecoming tour. But hey they put up thier money they can ask stupid questions. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 15 hours ago, Graeme Ro55 said: I would be very interested to learn more about the overhaul to disabled facilities. Where can I find more info on this? Ask away and I'll endeavour to answer as best I can. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post forlanssister 3,050 Posted December 6, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted December 6, 2022 15 hours ago, craig said: This is indeed great news my friend, so long as they follow through with it, which I am sure they will. Have you seen the plans ? Are they compliant ? I know that was one of the issues before, that our disabled facilities werent even close to being compliant for UEFA (I think it was UEFA) - this will at least be one of the big ticket items that the club needed to get resolved satisfactorily - glad it is now appropriately on the docket ! Yes they've done an excellent job in coming up with the proposal. I can't stress enough how approachable and determined the Board have been over the last 18 months, it was a refreshing change after years and years of banging my head against a brick wall. 9 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 5 hours ago, Bluedell said: If the disabled facilities are to be along the front of the Broomloan, will this impact the activities of the UBs? I suspect this is part of the reason for wishing to move the UB into BF3 it's a larger section than BF1 so even with the wheelchair area at the rear it should accommodate all those that are currently in BF1. I don't think in the grand scheme of things that the wheelchair platforms will have much if any impact on the UB's. Also those advocating safe standing shouldn't fret about this hindering safe standing because if anything this assist them as it removes an obstacle. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 1 hour ago, forlanssister said: I suspect this is part of the reason for wishing to move the UB into BF3 it's a larger section than BF1 so even with the wheelchair area at the rear it should accommodate all those that are currently in BF1. I don't think in the grand scheme of things that the wheelchair platforms will have much if any impact on the UB's. Also those advocating safe standing shouldn't fret about this hindering safe standing because if anything this assist them as it removes an obstacle. Thanks. I hadn't realised that the platforms were at the rear of BF/CF. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 3,774 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 On 05/12/2022 at 13:28, BEARGER said: 2. To reappoint Douglas Park as a Director of the Company. For – 28.83% Against – 64.31% Abstain – 6.85% Why so little discussion of this? Is it a typo? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 3 minutes ago, ranger_syntax said: Why so little discussion of this? Is it a typo? It isnt a typo mate. C1872 are in King's pocket... King doesnt like Park.... C1872 quite possibly been canvassing for this behind the scenes. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 3,774 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 1 minute ago, craig said: It isnt a typo mate. C1872 are in King's pocket... King doesnt like Park.... C1872 quite possibly been canvassing for this behind the scenes. I'm surprised that they managed it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 (edited) 7 minutes ago, craig said: It isnt a typo mate. C1872 are in King's pocket... King doesnt like Park.... C1872 quite possibly been canvassing for this behind the scenes. 64% of shares is a hell of a lot of votes against Park - far in excess of what's held by King and Club1872. This suggests to be there's more to this than meets the eye. Edit: sorry, belay that, I thought that was the result of the resolution Edited December 6, 2022 by Bill 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.