Jump to content

 

 

[FT] PSV 5 - 1 Rangers (Tavernier 64)


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, CammyF said:

Yes - you don't need to see wage bills to see that, you just have to watch the game last night.

 

 

C'mon mate, why be so pedantic? Do you really not get the point he is making regarding the use of our resources vs PSV?

 

If the figures are true then PSV have managed their finances in a much better way than us, and they also haven't needed to bed in their new players.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CammyF said:

Said for months that we'd only realise what players like Kent and Alfie brought to us once they had left

Morelos brought goals and Kent brought some flashes of brilliance in his early days. Alfie was a fantastic bargain acquisition, Kent not so much. But over the last season and a half neither contributed much so I’m glad they’re gone. 
Other forwards have been brought in. Are they as good? I wonder if Danilo might be. I’m seeing nothing in the others. Early days, I know. Often new players take time to get used to the way a team works but you can usually see some signs of capability. Not with these chaps unfortunately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

So they're 'light years ahead and far superior to us' in how their DoF and head coach have used their resources, despite having less resources?

 

That's ... quite damning, no?

No, their players are better than ours. It's really thst simple. We attempted to sign Veerman and couldn't get him  

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

What's the general consensus on how much time? Interested in what people think. 

 

 

Minimum of three days. If he survives that he could make it to Hallowe’en. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CammyF said:

No, their players are better than ours. It's really thst simple. We attempted to sign Veerman and couldn't get him  

That's the point, isn't it? 

 

Better players, better team from less - or even comparable - resources? 

 

It's not great, is it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

That's the point, isn't it? 

 

Better players, better team from less - or even comparable - resources? 

 

It's not great, is it?

They signed Dest on loan about a day before the game at Ibrox, he started and looked good. Schouten was there a week and bossed the game out of position at CB last night.

 

We are still waiting for guys who have been here months to click. 

 

 

Edited by Sutton_blows_goats
Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

That's the point, isn't it? 

 

Better players, better team from less - or even comparable - resources? 

 

It's not great, is it?

They are a more attractive option for players. We couldn't sign the players they've signed. Veerman proves that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, CammyF said:

They are a more attractive option for players. We couldn't sign the players they've signed. Veerman proves that. 

Veerman is Dutch, which maybe explains that one.

 

However, our wages aren't that different from PSV's and we have recently competed well in Europe, so I think your point is largely irrelevant. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.