Jump to content

 

 

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 15/01/22 in Posts

  1. I couldn’t care less about whether the old firm being used or not. I prefer to have no association whatsoever with that vile club & its tarred history from the east end
    3 points
  2. I’d like to see us kill the Old Firm brand stone dead
    2 points
  3. Just the same old narrative Rangers bad! boring Scottish gutter press!
    2 points
  4. It's Charles Green and Co suing Pacific Quay. How much is this whole sorry saga going to cost the public purse? I suggest both sets of interested parties strip to their waists, get into a ring, all armed with a chainsaw ......... Ding ding, seconds out!
    1 point
  5. In an ideal world, this would result in BBC Scotland being shut down. I'd take job losses for McLaughlin, English and Cosgrove and Stewart's freelance gig being binned though. Pacific Quay CSC isn't even satirical.
    1 point
  6. Hope I’m wrong but I think Patterson will regret going there
    1 point
  7. an interesting take on the celtc board claiming there is no such thing as the old firm. seems more harmful to the brand on the whole to me. I will say this celtc fans get very upset when you say old firm, i do it as often as possible.
    1 point
  8. It seems to me that it has outlived most, if not all, commercial usefulness. Moreover, was it not rasellik which went on record (OK, Twitter, but officially) to declare that it was 'not half of anything', and made, elsewhere, pointed reference to 'the Glasgow derby'?
    1 point
  9. Alan Pattullo is a Dundee fan. This last decade, Dundee has been owned by BIG Sellik fan, John Nelms. Dundee and ra Sellik share staff(Gordon Strachan), share players(Leigh Griffiths), share convenient hidey-holes(Dundee Spam Folder), ......... share Journos(Alan Pattullo). It's just a natural progression. Pattullo's take is to be expected, it's more of the same continually proffered by RAB Cosgrove, Spiers, Jum Spence, ......... etc. They tell us we(Rangers supporters) are on the sidelines and in the same sentence add, they don't get us. Three or four decades of pushing this message results in articles such as the above. Rangers supporters are comfortable with the current arrangement. We had 20 years of being confined to a Sellik Park corner with poor sight lines and restricted views. We had effigies hanging by the neck, twisting in the breeze, above a dozen 'kill all H-u-ns' flags. The Pattullo's congratulated the Green Brigade for witty and clever banners and ignored the fact the PF lost all evidence against the nine GB members charged. A public inquiry promised, never reported and, the Pattullos don't ask why? Perhaps Alan et al should talk to Rangers supporters? The replies should be, 'we're half of nothing'.
    1 point
  10. I do believe that he would, and that, in all probability, he has.
    1 point
  11. Them getting the corner is quite enough. I wonder if Alan Pattullo would let supporters of proscribed terrorist groups or paedo enablers into his house?
    1 point
  12. Looks like SKY have switched up the schedule because there are PL games on. From what I see, we're only getting one half of the Nigeria game? That's a bit unfair. If they are going to commit to showing AFCON, then commit to it. Anyway--'Mon the Sudan!
    1 point
  13. As Ted says, there was an uncredited interview with Ange on BBC Scotland's website yesterday. So, Chris McLaughlin was rawking the Vapors(thanks Ted) vibe. There was a staged photo of the Japanese triumvirate with their socks pulled thigh high, Nippon Ingenue? Chris added that Sellik had no interest in getting into a bidding war for McGree's signing. I think that comment has been pulled today?
    1 point
  14. Going by the transcript of the interview on PQ website yesterday "Ange not seeking further January additions" .The sub text I find interesting. He acknowledged they approached McGree but admits "after initial discussions McCree decided to look elsewhere. 2 days ago it seemed a done deal? In December, it was also a given that Jota was being signed for £7.5m during this window. Now the sands have shifted slightly, Ange now states " .... with these things they will rumble on in the background. Nothing significant has happened." Really? Seems to me the biscuit tin may be a bit sparse of funds now they have splurged their kitty on the Japanese market. The article ended on a very sad note. It appears nobody loves Leigh anymore. Dundee no longer want him on loan, Sellick don't want him back! What a sad end for the little man who's been "Turning Japanese" for most of his career. Enough to give one The Vapors.
    1 point
  15. I think the writing is on the wall in big capital letters, underlined, in red .... Goldson is leaving and the transition to a Souttar/Helander partnership will likely be made before the end of this season.
    1 point
  16. John Souttar has signed a pre-contract agreement to join Rangers next season. Of course, he could join Rangers as early as this month, depending whether both Hearts and Rangers can achieve a mutually acceptable transfer fee? I have waited until today's announcement to comment upon BBC Scotland's Tom Anguish's take on the probability of Souttar joining Rangers. Last Sunday, Tom spent thirty minutes talking Scottish transfers this January window. Souttar's proposed leaving of Hearts took up 15-20 minutes of the chat. He talked of three English Championship sides that had expressed interest; Stoke City had the advantage of his Brother playing there, Sheffield United had recent experienced Premiership status for three years and, Blackburn Rovers are on the cusp of promotion. According to Tom, the remuneration on offer at all three English clubs would be excellent. Tom thought English Premiership clubs should be involved too, he lionised Souttar as a player, "he's young, will only get better and, he could could be sold on again to a top side in two, three years for serious money". He was reminded by Host, Kenny Macintyre that Rangers were also vying for his signature? Tom was annoyed, he waffled again about Souttar's serious potential then, "it's reported Rangers are showing an interest, why isn't it two Scottish clubs"? Kenny intervened, "are you talking about involvement from Celtic"? Tom gave vent to his anguish and frustration, "of course, Souttar suits their model, buy cheap, sell later for a higher fee. The player will benefit from regular European football and be in constant domestic competition for honours, ------- (silence for a couple of seconds, then the afterthought) ----- and of course Rangers can offer that too". The very thought of Rangers involvement had Tom fulminating, now he has signed; I suspect Souttar's potential will be quickly dialed down? Tom has got to get a grip of his anguish. John Souttar has become another player you will NOT be interviewing, simply because he has signed for Rangers.
    1 point
  17. I am delighted with this signing. He has a lot to offer us and is Scottish. Can't wait to see him play for us.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to London/GMT+01:00


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.