Bluedell

Gerrard will either go 4-3-3 or 4-3-2-1, and in both formations Arfield will get the shout before Stewart.

Have to pay to see it. ?

Or due to other failures, like not shifting some players out of the door and one or 2 purchases?

I'd expect the front 3 to be Arfield, Morelos and Kent, and I'd be happy with that. Whilst Stewart helps open up packed defences, I don't think that will be the case at Parkhead and the extra pressing that Arfield brings will probably see him start before Stewart.

He's 30 league games away from becoming one!

Ojo gives us pace upfront which Stewart and Arfield don't have. We would be a lot easier to play against in Europe if we didn't play him and it would allow their full backs to press further up the park. Ojo may not be brilliant, but the same comments were being made about Kent early last season. He needs confidence and the backing of the fans.

"Happy Birthday Defoe" That's Mr Defoe to you. ?

You would think that Sturgeon should be praising Rangers fans for eliminating the sectarian songs, rather than making cheap political points.

Good to see Kamara back on form again. Hopefully he can start to put a run of good games together.

As the usual suspects of Morelos and Jack weren't playing (apart from Alfie's cameo) it has to be Davis. He popped up everywhere and was class.

I've heard that the play a narrow 4-4-2 and their width is supplied by the full backs. Could make for an interesting match-up.

As exclusively revealed by me 3 weeks ago ?

I guess it depends on the wording of the contract, something none of us have seen. "Damages" as defined within the contract may cover certain breaches but obviously not what we have done. Part of our problem is that the person we sent to the hearing is "untruthful" and "unconvincing" and that's not going to help the judge look favourably on us when it comes to this sort of thing. That's why the club need to bin Blair now and bring in someone who has credibility.

After we pay the settlement, we're still in the same position. The contract still exists and we've still got to give SD the chance to bid for our contracts. There's an injunction us using Hummel next season so goodness knows what's going to happen. My understanding is that the club failed in its attempt to limit the damages to £1m. The judge said "I am satisfied that damages are not an adequate remedy for Rangers’ breaches" so the damages clause is irrelevant. I fail to see why we're in a better financial position now. Previously we had SD for another 7 years, now we seem to have them forever. I'm not sure why James Blair is still in his position. His credibility is shot and his competence has to be seriously questioned as well.

I wonder if the compliance officer will cite Ntcham in the same way as she did Ryan Kent?

We've done this before in Australia and China and nothing came from it, and was a waste of time, effort and money.

The various sources have nothing to do with the UBs or the club.

Neither am I. I don't have any sympathy with them for the use of pyro. All I was sayiing was that they are admitting that they use it, and it's not related to the injury per se.

FFS. Aye, so you did. ? Do you want the club or Boris Johnson to come out with a statement on it to make it official? It was a 15 year old from Paisley who isn't a member of the UBs. Decide for yourself the veracity of the statement.

They seem to be taking ownership of that themselves, and whereas there are issues with the pyro, the main complaints and the source of the injury were the bangers.

Not sure what you mean by official but it's come from a number of different sources, some of which I would describe as reliable.

However it's known who threw the banger last night and it wasn't a UB, so if people are trying to imply that it was them then that's unfair. There's enough to criticise the UBs for without them being falsely accused for stuff that doesn't involve them.

Yeah, Helander struggled a LOT more than Katic did.

He's a bloody idiot. He shouldn't be allowed near a post match interview again.

I heard it's a tough watch. Not sure if I want to watch it. ?