aweebluesoandso

Feck it i'm getting my shout in first, a 46 short blazer please and can have the WATP under the club badge. Thank you.

So we have a Provisional and a Continuity and a breakaway Consortium, or am i confused?

I would just like to hear from the candidates, what they want in return from the club's board, on behalf of the supporters. Are they prepared to argue, for a fair deal for our financial input?

I have no trouble with anyone sitting in the directors box, as long as they remember they are there representing the supporters and looking after our interests.

Someone has to do the fecking job, but i won't be voting for who i perceive as company men, by company men i mean Rangers board placemen.

That report will be quickly debunked, by the usual sources. It doesn't suit the establishment's agenda of working class football fans being sectarian, violent wife beaters.

I agree Boabie one whiff of collusion and my wallet closes quicker than Bear trap. I know a good deal when i see one, conversely even with my swollen Prostate, i can tell when my balls are being massaged.

Women are taking over the world, no bad thing, i married one of them that's all i'm going to say

i'm quite content to wait till the proposals are put before the supporters, as long as it a good deal for the support the Joint Group will get my financial input. If it looks like a stitch up and the supporters get no real return, then they wont be getting my money, simple as, I support this board, but i support the supporters more.

Is anyone really surprised?

Good for him, where's my invite?

i'm a member of both the RST and RF, I think there are some good, hard working and trust worthy candidates from both these organisations. All i ask is they make sure we the supporters get a good return for our financial investment. Not just the return in share options part, but with the return on our direct cash investment going to the club. Rich men put in their cash and get shares, seats in the directors box, hospitality etc., what exactly is the supporters getting in return?

Cant argue with this, as that's generally true? Although injury, red card or such get's in the managers way for his choices.

It was surreal listening to Killie fans singing the BB, with total and bemused silence from our fans.

As long as the candidates are truly independent and not club appointees.

Both the RF and RST between them, should have built up a large cash balance in their bank's at this stage. 50% of that towards shares and 50% towards the club, merging both cash balances would be a significant sum? I really hope the joint fans group receives something significant in return for our money.

Willie Miller always thought he was a good leader.

everything has been said more or less, but what did surprise me yesterday with Zel, was his tackling,. He is learning to put a dig in.

Stephen Hawkins has an IQ of 162 and Einstein was 160. That's as high as the scale goes, mine is in the 2, 3 or 4 bracket.

Quiet and rather muted protest today, led by the GSOS, Grandson's Of Struth. Confident young man.

I'll be on the protest tomorrow.

Don't see the panic here, they are still faces nine charges, it looks like to me a tightening up of things by the prosecutor. Better aiming small than aiming wide and missing the target.

Could be they helped the prosecutor with his enquiry?

If it's an affidavit it is.

Ashley is desperate to get a ruling in a court of law, that can separate him from one or other of his companies that is involved in these dodgy deals to rip the club off. He owns the company has most of the shares, or all of the shares in the case of MASH. But wants a court to rule the company is one thing and Mike Ashley is another, but we all know he makes the decisions, gives the orders and gave the loans to the club. But it seems very important to him to have some minor distinction of separation that he can apply in any further court case against the club?