Jump to content

 

 

crucible

  • Posts

    386
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by crucible

  1. Ashely to ditch the riches of the EPL for the poor house of Scottish football, you couldn't make it up they however like to try to imply so. As for PM pity he wasn't so sentient when SDM was running us as his private business club and door opener.
  2. Disturbing air of people trying to accomodate liewwell's comment, thankfully it was fully addressed on Rangerschat tonight without fear or favour.
  3. I will go with the club over the Rangers hating rhebel any day and any way.
  4. Life is so much sweeter when the likes of in particular the rhebel and other rags paper filling rubbish is totally ignored.
  5. Good to see the record story being torn to pieces in most places.
  6. It is not the remit of the SFA to conduct a fit and proper person test.
  7. They claimed the names were being scrutinised by McColl's lawyers, we now know that is untrue even if you do not.
  8. I understand they do not have something they claimed they did,names. I am always wary of people who tell me what can only be described as an untruth.
  9. There is nothing to grasp not even any names that the requisitioners claimed they had, I suspect they are tilting at windmills a very poor show all round by them.
  10. I doubt anyone will be losing voting rights, nominees work in every other case no one is going to be changing protocol for us.
  11. I would lay odds no names other than the nominees which we already have will be forthcoming, an embarassment doesn't even begin to cover it coupled with blatant misinformation an utter shambles.
  12. Total damp squib with a few contradictions, specifically the administration nonsense.
  13. Regan did make the statement, lawwell has now seen fit to comment on something that he has no reason to at this time, I know who the owners are they are Blue Pitch and Margarita works for me and apparently it did for the SFA until people started making waves.
  14. I am happy with the outcome of Pinsent Masons inquiry I have no desire to bring it up again under any circumstances, regan has made it clear the possible consequences of whyte involvement, I have no desire to challenge him on that or see him supplied with any possible ammunition to advance his thoughts on the matter. If you and others are willing to risk all to prove some point carry on, as before I won't be joining you, not because I believe whyte is involved but because I am aware of the possible consequences of opening a can of worms that was well sealed by Pinsent Masons. In case you haven't noticed we are where we are, we have no power to change that other than climbing the leagues, we are at the behest of others.
  15. I as you have no given right to know, you appear with others to believe that you do have a right, I can live with the fact that I don't.
  16. I think Whyte is involved ? you will have to show me where I said that, which I didn't maybe you confuse me with Alistair Johnston. I do not know whither whyte is involved or not but I lean to the view that he isn't, however I am not willing as you are to risk everything to find out and reopen something put to bed by Pinsent Masons, as highlighted by the poster D'Artagnan.
  17. It would depend how much credence you afford the source to believe any of their lines.
  18. Day late rhebel have been taken to task over this story by the LSE and asked to remove comments attributed to LSE from it, they will be running a major "fit and proper" article tomorrow, some more stirring no doubt.
  19. Hence I qualified it by using doesn't or didn't and highlighted the date.
  20. Fit and proper is the responsibility of clubs to ensure and execute not the SFA's, if the SFA find at a later date that they have been misinformed/deceived regan makes it quite clear that sanctions are available.
  21. Unfortunately there are those only to willing to fuel this particular fire, who indeed needs enemies.
  22. Dave King doesn't or didn't appear to give it any backing, as it is from the day late rhebel it should be acceptable as gospel. Dave King interview: Fans takeover plan for Rangers never had a chance to succeeding 25 Jun 2010 00:00 EXCLUSIVE: DAVE King has dismissed as a pipedream the idea Rangers could ever be owned and operated by its fans. Dave King has dismissed as a pipedream the idea Rangers could ever be owned and operated by its fans. The Ibrox director says his club's supporters already invest more in their team than any other followers in the world and it's unrealistic to expect more. He says the concept of fan ownership, backed by bodies such as the Rangers Trust, won bank and Murray Group support during the club's darkest days last season. But he emphatically stated it was always a non-starter in his eyes and there is no great groundswell of support for fan ownership among the majority of the Light Blues legions.
  23. We would appear to be going round in circles here, using a proxy to conceal your shareholding is quite legal, until it isn't neither you nor I have any legal right to know who is the beneficial owner of said shares otherwise why would proxies/nominees be used everyday as a legitimate business tool by countless companies, at that I am out.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.