Jump to content

 

 

crucible

  • Posts

    386
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by crucible

  1. Yesterdays timid affair was nothing like the meeting with the board, either in numbers or content a sham in my eyes.
  2. Hugely disappointing and says nothing new or of any note from the meeting. King is said to meeting the Easdales at this moment.
  3. My concern would hinge on whither I was a long term investor or short term speculator, I will subscribe to my own thoughts that the stories of who approached whom are somewhat open to interpretation.
  4. Any report I have seen on who was approached by disgruntled shareholders cites Paul Murray, I do not subscribe to that story for one moment.
  5. I see no evidence that he is the driving force, his investors are alleged to be unhappy at his time spent on us, he has stated his reluctance for any meaningful involvement in the running of the club and he is certainly no sugar daddy.
  6. You have neither a moral nor a legal right to know anything about people who for whatever reason use the proper avenues to protect their identity in any company or investment, the SFA know the beneficial owners if they are satisfied I have no reason not to be. I have no doubt of McColl's reaction if anyone started digging into his off-shore involvements or proxies.
  7. Can we assume from that the RST have already decided on allegiance, as only some remain to be convinced that PM/ JM is the way to go ?
  8. Exactly what we don't need another private meeting, don't understand why it can't be public for all fans rather than minority bodies or even filmed for all or broadcast by Rangers Chat radio.
  9. Why would it be a problem if it is statutory law, I doubt anyone is going to change business law/rules to suit us.
  10. If McCoist didn't know what sort of financial basket case we were after being promoted as the face that saved Rangers and urging fans to buy season tickets, we must have been fed some amount of PR horse shit about Ally's involvement at every level.
  11. Wasn't a Rangers man involved in sanctioning payments that being MM ?
  12. What is their combined membership numbers, who do they speak for.
  13. Seems very similiar to concerns raised by McColl's investors, perhaps they would rather not weep.
  14. I was going to say I wonder why DD doesn't get the same scrutiny before I realised I don't wonder at all.
  15. As far as I am concerned it would only be Baxter and he has the added kudos of actually playing for the rest of the world select against England, then World Cup holders
  16. Looks like the nomad is saying get it sorted or we will do it for you.
  17. No it's quite clearly Rangers hating english's diatribe, if you want to deflect it elsewhere that is up to you.
  18. An anti King diatribe badly disguised, I believe he is bringing his views to the attention of the authorities, nothing new from that Rangers hater.
  19. I really will leave it with you and your words, forgive me for laughing at your naivety.. "But you are denying it based on CF being Rangers-hating. Rangers-hating doesnt make it untruthful".
  20. Pretty clear what you claimed, as you guessed Pinsent Masons, thing is what are you suggesting they were speculating about, maybe check with your source ?
  21. Enough said, if you want to continue to attempt to justify a Rangers hating site carry on.
  22. You would obviously have to trust a Rangers hating site that uses doctored docs as your choice of source, your prerogative to give them the credence that no one I know would.
  23. I couldn't even hazard a guess I don't frequent Rangers hating sites, I saw on FF it was credited to the fakes site.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.