Jump to content

 

 

Rangersitis

  • Posts

    3,601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rangersitis

  1. SARS being under investigation will have no bearing on the SFA ruling. That will still be rumbling on long after King and Murray apply to the football authorities. I wasn't implying that King would be breaking any laws, just that it wouldn't be a compelling argument for a new era of transparency.
  2. It's not totally different. There has been continual condemnation of puppet boards doing the bidding for others. While I am not equating King with Easdale, the situation that gunslinger proposed is little different.
  3. Are you happy with Sandy Easdale's role? If not, you really can't advocate King pulling the same stunt.
  4. The last thing that is needed is more farce. King can't threaten forensics looking into past misdemeanours only to then have himself take on the Sandy Easdale shadow role. As I stated, if they have provisional clearance from the authorities, all will be well.
  5. That argument is nonsense. Also, the rules at the time, which were a joke, have been changed since that time. Unless King and Murray have been given private reassurances that there will be no bar to their bids, they are embarking on along a dangerous, and potentially embarrassing path.
  6. Whatever they did / said the end result would have been the same. Good on them for choosing the right path.
  7. You wouldn't be happy with 'generic' plans that we have all heard before, and given what we already know about secret deals for Ashley, how the hell can they be expected to give plans on merchandising? Unrealistic demands won't make any difference to what needs to be done first.
  8. Thank God we have announced that we will be using a new NOMAD in the future.....
  9. You have repeatedly told everyone that King doesn't have it. Do you not have the inside track on any of the others?
  10. The fans don't deserve to be told anything which could change further down the line due to unforeseen circumstances. What group would lay out their finances while engaged in a takeover attempt? I suspect that your nosiness will be well down their list of priorities at the current time.
  11. Putting to one side that there is a battle for control raging at the minute, have any of the outside parties been given the type of access required to be able to reveal that sort of detail?
  12. I didn't say that they couldn't bid, but as they have already stated that Ibrox shouldn't be used as security, never mind sold to the highest bidder, I would put it in the box labelled doubtful. [sNIPPED] Post edited - Member warned: Frankie
  13. Thanks for pointing out something which hasn't been levelled at anyone on the RFB. As for your assertion that all fans are impotent, I beg to differ. Those who currently fund them by purchasing individual match tickets or by shopping for Rangers merchandise can most certainly do something effective.
  14. This is one instance where 'something is better than nothing' just doesn't work. They have no real power to influence as it is, but if they resigned en masse, that would send out a big message. I won't be holding my breath on that happening.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.