Super_Ally
-
Posts
12,625 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Super_Ally
-
I am also a member on FF EvoX, so perhaps that mutual animosity is not so great as you believe.
-
People can earn some respect and belief about their comments based on previous behaviour. As Johnny says, NL has a previous online history that affords him some level of trust from fans who are familiar with his online persona. Whilst it is best to be sceptical of faceless people online, I think it is just as reasonable to afford some trusted posters the benefit of the doubt. Sure this trust may come back to burn you, but I take NL as being pretty honest and believable. Could probably be better written.
-
I actually thought Hateley could have took it further at points. Also when one of these vitriolic attacks is conducted from the darkside against us, they do not bring up Celtic's faults or involve them unnecesarily as Hateley has. He is not alone in that, it is a consistent fault throughout Scottish media. Oh, and that Tim ian quoted is a raging loony. Hateley has merely said what he thinks. It is, as stated,an opinion piece. He has said nothing libelous nor anything that relates to that mentalists miriad of complaints.
-
3-1. Boyd must be due a goal or two. Davis for one too.
-
He was bought to win them the league. They are now further behind than before he came. They wont win the league. Ergo he is not worth his loan fee nor extortianate wage. This loan signing is a waste of money, even if he scores a few goals. Whether he signs on after that doesn't affect the fact that they've made an error with the loan deal.
-
Mowbray's tag-line for failure?
-
Rangers as it stands minus CL involvement
Super_Ally replied to OnlyOneAmoruso's topic in Rangers Chat
The inference was that Smith was handed out money like it grew on trees whilst Eck had it witheld. A little look at the facts shows that the big spend from Smith is mostly balanced out with large sales rarely/infrequently seen in Scotland. Similar to Eck's dealings in selling Boumsong. You can continue to spout tripe but your arguement falls flat with a little look at the facts. Both managers were backed financially as much as possible. But different circumstances at different times dictated that the backing was not identical. -
Rangers as it stands minus CL involvement
Super_Ally replied to OnlyOneAmoruso's topic in Rangers Chat
You should know. The way you spoke it was as if the club deliberately found funds outwith our intended expenditure and budgets to help out Walter but did not do the same for Eck. I know you like to write in riddles and generally spout mince but if you can't understand the simple fact that Walter's spend has only been as high as it has due to the income generated from the sale of players like Hutton and Cuellar you are beyond help. Had Eck helped develop players to the point that we sold the mfor what are exceptional fees in the Scottish game, he would be given the funds to reinvest. As he was with the Boumsong sale. In fact your point is complete bs as proven by that one transfer window alone. Insert irrelevant smilies here.... -
Rangers as it stands minus CL involvement
Super_Ally replied to OnlyOneAmoruso's topic in Rangers Chat
Smith has not been "given" money that was denied Eck. For the most Smiths spending has been met by sales. His net spend is tiny. Therefore, generating profit on Cuellar, Hutton etc has funded much of his spending. If we had not taken in about �£17 mil from those two sales that alone would about half Walter's "spending". To try and paint it otherwise merely demonstrates an agenda. -
A little suprised to see people knocking him purely on ability. Questioning his fitness and susceptibility (sp) to injuty fair enough. But not ability imo.
-
We need 6 wins from 10 games. Or 60% of the available points. And that's assuming Celtic don't drop points again this season. So 6 or 7 out of 9 will do. But I would not be suprised to see us collect all 9.
-
Wasn't available last time, so assume it's the same again.
-
I think we'll win the treble so i'm not fussed. :spl: Not sure how that fits in with the mhankies conspiracy theories though?
-
A fit and on form Webster will do for me.
-
Just do both. :spl:
-
Paddy power paying out on Rangers winning the league:
-
-
2-0 v Killie makes it 6 more wins from 10 games, or 18 more points for the title. :spl:
-
Lol. I'm not a tim and i'm not a member of the Scottish press so I can say what I think and call things straight.
-
Would I say I had enjoyed listening to their games as well only to turn off at the singing? No (unless they were getting beat!). Clearly sour grapes. Get it up them!
-
I didn't say we were any great shakes in Europe. But we don't get the credit we deserve domestically as Walter rightly points out. Any time we win, it's ground out. Which is bullshit. We've outscored the Gallowgate Galacticos who are apparently an attacking team. It jsut doesn't stack up.
-
Does Goncalves play CB for Hearts now? Thought he was signed as a FB?
-
Overrated from day 1. Said from the off he was prone to daft errors. Decent enough player, but not the superstar our press made him out to be.
-
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/rangers/walter-smith-tired-of-critics-and-insists-current-rangers-team-are-as-good-as-any-he-has-managed-1.1011998 Seems Walter agrees. Highlighted the paragraph in bold. Think he makes some fair points there. Lazy journalism to say that the side outscoring Barceltona are defensive and stodgy.
-
From Spanishbear1690 on FF who recently visited McBeath's grave: