bmck 117 Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 Domestic trebles are so rare, Im thoroughly gutted by that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Preston Burke 0 Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 Domestic trebles are so rare, Im thoroughly gutted by that. They're not exactly 'that' rare. We won 3 trebles between 1993 and 2003. Has any English club even won 3 trebles? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 0 Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 Agreed. last night was a massive loss. Trebles are the hardest thing to win and ultimate domestic achievement. I'm amazed at how easily some people are dismissing it. And using the sellick result as consolation is, I'm afraid, only too typical. I am getting much more of an impression of bears being happy at Timmy's misery than being gutted at last night's result. I never thought I'd see the day when we enjoyed their misery more than grieving our own failure. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 0 Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 They're not exactly 'that' rare. We won 3 trebles between 1993 and 2003. Has any English club even won 3 trebles? You'd say all this because you don't care about cups. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 To vbe honest I dont think playing Boyd , Miller and or Novo would have made any difference , we dont have enough back up in midfield , it aint rocket science , apart from Edu the rest were just making up numbers . You might get away with playing Lafferty , or Naismith in midfield when you have your first choice beside them but not when the entire midfield is changed , any way just an opinion . I've been saying since the beginning of the season that we're short in central midfield and it's been proven. Ferguson had to go, but selling Adam and leaving us with just Davis, Thomson, Edu & McCulloch for central midfield was a big mistake IMO and was something I didn't want to happen. Other people have remarkably been saying that we've got too many central midfielders! Well I ask those of that opinion (you know who you are!) where were all our central midfielders last night? Two suspended & one out sick and we're left with ONE central midfielder? Brilliant! Nothing to worry about! We've got too many central midfielders! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,356 Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 .I've been saying since the beginning of the season that we're short in central midfield and it's been proven. Ferguson had to go, but selling Adam and leaving us with just Davis, Thomson, Edu & McCulloch for central midfield was a big mistake IMO and was something I didn't want to happen. Other people have remarkably been saying that we've got too many central midfielders! Well I ask those of that opinion (you know who you are!) where were all our central midfielders last night? Two suspended & one out sick and we're left with ONE central midfielder? Brilliant! Nothing to worry about! We've got too many central midfielders! We weren't short of central midfielders until we sold Mendes in January. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 We weren't short of central midfielders until we sold Mendes in January. . Who's Mendes? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 0 Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 We weren't short of central midfielders until we sold Mendes in January. Still aren't. We have 4 CMs - how often do you have 3 CMs out for the same game? So do you think we should have 6 CMs? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 Still aren't. We have 4 CMs - how often do you have 3 CMs out for the same game? . That it happened last night and played a part in us not achieving the treble isn't worth noting when considering how many central mids we have then? Four is not enough! We have more than four when you start counting the youngsters like Ness, but apparently they can't even get a game when we're left with only Edu standing in midfield, so why count them? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 0 Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 .That it happened last night and played a part in us not achieving the treble isn't worth noting when considering how many central mids we have then? Four is not enough! We have more than four when you start counting the youngsters like Ness, but apparently they can't even get a game when we're left with only Edu standing in midfield, so why count them? Very few clubs have more than 4 first choice CMs. We were damn unlucky with suspensions and illness which wiped out almost the lot. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.