Anchorman 0 Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 For me, something has turned very wrong in today's game when a supporter (at the end of the day that is what he is, and it's not a pop at MD) gets this media publicity. It makes me quite sad. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 He goes to games but doesn't buy tickets or own a season book. He gets hand outs. Yeah I meant he doesn't pay. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWee BlueDevil 0 Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 There will be plenty of erections this evening on VB and RM! You are not wrong, on one of those sites they are drooling like a stray dog in a butcher's shop, mods, admin, the lot. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossy 0 Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 There are, sadly, a number of Rangers fans who seem to hate Mark Dingwall more than they hate those people who have really tried to damage our club. Personally, I have interacted with him a few times and never had a problem. It would be unfortunate if the STV story was wrong and wrong because either another Rangers fan or somebody closely connected to the Board had deliberately fed them disinformation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 A couple of weeks ago someone (or some people plural?) started spreading a rumour that the Trust had been reported to the FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) regarding the new DD scheme. Taipan who designed the scheme was answering questions about it on another forum and said he didn't know about any complaint. Anyway, I don't know if this is a separate issue or not, but there seems to be a number of regular attacks on the Trust from within our own fanbase. I can't help wondering if the resigned board member being referred to is in any way linked to the curious case of complaints against investment fund manager John Bennett who was forced to withdraw from The Blue Knights? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossy 0 Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 I can't help wondering if the resigned board member being referred to is in any way linked to the curious case of complaints against investment fund manager John Bennett who was forced to withdraw from The Blue Knights? If that were the case then we would be looking at a resignation that happened over three years ago. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 3,768 Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 sorry, probably a very stupid question to the initiated but what do the Board/TJ have to gain from discrediting MD, he's not an influencer in respect to swathes of share voters is he? Presumably some people would be dissuaded from giving a proxy to the RST. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 6,134 Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 are the police involved 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 You'd almost think an AGM was coming up. Oh wait..... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 their are some people out there very jealous that the trust didn't fall apart without them. indeed its gone from strength to strength. this looks from the stv article at least to be a bit different but it's a real shame that some can't leave the trust alone to prosper without them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.