chilledbear 16 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 So freedom of speech does have its limits in your world too? A rhethorical question, BTW. You can say what you want bd, one things for sure, I'll not sue you. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue 64 53 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Sandy Easdales criminal behaviour has been proven beyond all reasonable doubt, so much so the he personally felt compelled to admit to it in the dock at Croydon Crown Court. Am I right in thinking Craig has a tainted past. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTP 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Am I right in thinking Craig has a tainted past. He isn't on the Rangers board so who cares? The Krays have a tainted past ................ as relevant as Craig. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Maybe that is because most people on here right now focus on Easdale and openly ignore that he has rights and can use them like you and me? Where would you end up denying him these rights - whether we like the action he took or not? You do agree that we are talking about different things here, i.e. Easdale's court case and his right to sue people who libel him. I'm talking about the latter and if people see fault in that, so be it. It sure is nothing "pro-Easdale" in there and I for one would have hoped that either party had behaved more appropriate, not least Easdale. It's not that he has rights, mate - that's a given in a liberal democracy. What's awful about this is that he has voluntarily taken a post which brings with it abuse, be it Rangers or Pollok Juniors. Everyone knows it, some can take it, others can't. Maybe it's nothing to be proud of in Scots football culture, but that is how it is and it is not going to change. So by attacking not newspapers who berate us, not fans of other clubs who abuse us in illegal terms, not other clubs who cast aspersions on safety at our ground, but one of our own he is left looking like the wrong man in the wrong job. The only argument in favour I can think of is that Easdale is on a one man crusade to clean up football. And I don't think any of us buy that one. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 The ones defending Easdale are the usual, anti- RST, anti- FF, anti -MD, anti -SOS, anti- Paul Murray, in fact anti anybody or anything that criticises the past or present Board. They are perfectly entitled to their opinions same as we are. But it's plain who only appears whenever the board are doing something dumb, and can be safely ignored. LIkes of dB or D'Artagnan have to be taken seriously, surely. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 They are perfectly entitled to their opinions same as we are. But it's plain who only appears whenever the board are doing something dumb, and can be safely ignored. LIkes of dB or D'Artagnan have to be taken seriously, surely. No problem with peoples opinions, just pointing out it is the same ones supporting the Board, no matter what they do. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Well, aye, but dB isn't supporting the board, just pointing out that they have rights - which is true, but kinda laughable in the context of a football chief taking the hump over some abuse from fans. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Am I right in thinking Craig has a tainted past. watch you don't get sued. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Well, aye, but dB isn't supporting the board, just pointing out that they have rights - which is true, but kinda laughable in the context of a football chief taking the hump over some abuse from fans. I admit I wasn't including db, although I had a bet with myself we would see D'Art on today. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 I admit I wasn't including db, although I had a bet with myself we would see D'Art on today. Well I hope you gave yourself good odds. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.