Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

knowing what i do of the easdales i reckon they are taking a big chance flouting themselves in public like this. This could very easily come back to haunt them, it couldi nfact ruin them.

 

You think the complainant might have a job establishing that he has a character or positive reputation to defame? While I have no sympathy for him, this is going to look absolutely awful for Rangers. Going to make raising capital soooooo much easier, eh? As usual, it's the club that will suffer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ones defending Easdale are the usual, anti- RST, anti- FF, anti -MD, anti -SOS, anti- Paul Murray, in fact anti anybody or anything that criticises the past or present Board.

Not that those folk/groups are connected in any way at all of course.

 

But always better to just engage in discussion surely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ones defending Easdale are the usual, anti- RST, anti- FF, anti -MD, anti -SOS, anti- Paul Murray, in fact anti anybody or anything that criticises the past or present Board.

 

Wonder who that might be. IMHO, the above is a veiled attempt at factionalism. Either you are "pro-Houston and against Easdale", or you are "pro anything boardish". Alas, we do not live in a binary-coded world.

 

Sweeping statements are rarely accurate but I am at a loss as to how anyone can defend this action.

 

Maybe that is because most people on here right now focus on Easdale and openly ignore that he has rights and can use them like you and me? Where would you end up denying him these rights - whether we like the action he took or not? You do agree that we are talking about different things here, i.e. Easdale's court case and his right to sue people who libel him. I'm talking about the latter and if people see fault in that, so be it. It sure is nothing "pro-Easdale" in there and I for one would have hoped that either party had behaved more appropriate, not least Easdale.

Edited by der Berliner
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the removal of the post & apology from this site was enough, why isn't it enough for SoS? Why push for them to sign a gagging order? The whole situation stinks. Hate people who can just chuck money at whatever they deem a problem just because they can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A point I saw on twitter aswell:

 

If I reply to the clubs official twitter feed with a slanderous comment aimed at Easdale ........................ will he sue the club?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.