Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Penny shares just seems like corruption to me, and a total con.

 

Can you imagine asking someone to go into business with you and they are supposed to put £100,000 in while you put in £1,000 but you now own 50% of the company each. Not only that, since you are responsible for raising the capital you get a bonus from the company of £10,000 plus over priced wages and expenses and onerous contracts for you mates (with kickbacks of course)...? So you're now about £20k richer with half the shares of a company now worth about £50k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think there is for mere plebs like us but the Board will be aware of who voted for what and exactly what they need to do to push it through this time round.

 

Disapplication of pre-emptive rights is a pretty standard motion in PLC's and I've voted in favour of such motions many times however those companies had boards that could be trusted, we're a million miles away from that.

 

Thanks. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Penny shares just seems like corruption to me, and a total con.

 

Can you imagine asking someone to go into business with you and they are supposed to put £100,000 in while you put in £1,000 but you now own 50% of the company each. Not only that, since you are responsible for raising the capital you get a bonus from the company of £10,000 plus over priced wages and expenses and onerous contracts for you mates (with kickbacks of course)...? So you're now about £20k richer with half the shares of a company now worth about £50k.

 

It's not uncommon depending what you bring to the business.

 

A valuable patent for example.

 

In this instance it's outright ****ery though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The saga continues.

 

With almost every club utterance, from football to finance, disillusionment spreads, hope fades and a realisation that this sorry tale might not end well, takes hold.

 

Where once there was optimism, now there is fatalism. The only real hope for a long-term viable and stable future - fan ownership - has been largely ignored by the main body of the kirk, and of course mixed messages on the issue have been unhelpful and unnecessary.

 

Instead, we are left to wonder if a saviour will come along to rehabilitate our dying institution, and this word 'saviour' both insults and condemns us. We should never have been in this place, but we are here because we trusted to luck on club ownership - the worst mistake it was possible to make. We thought that market forces would protect us indefinitely - and some still do - but institutions like ours cannot survive by taking risks on the most basic of basic issues.

 

We are spectators now, watching from the outside as the inside crumbles. The pessimists have been justified - and the optimists have been misguided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.