Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

There is no "perhaps" about it. If you do not believe me, then please ask Rev McQuarrie yourself; then perhaps you would be good enough to post his reply.

 

I'll wait till Monday to speak to him but don't see the need to post it on the internet for all to see.

 

I am told that he has a reputation for being scrupulously fair which is why he was invited to take the role and has held similar positions in the past.

 

I don't doubt that for a second.

 

He does not have a vote in the elections for Office Bearers.

 

Indeed, he is however overseeing the process.

 

However, if you think that the fact that I spoke to him for the reason stated post the election renders him unsuitable to chair the first meeting because he might be in some way biased when it comes to the conduct of the office bearers election should there be one (though it's not clear to me how he might exercise such bias) then I suggest you ask him to stand down when the agenda is considered.

 

I don't doubt the Reverend's suitability for so much as a single second and I certainly am not accusing him of bias in any shape or form, frankly I'm at a loss as how anyone in their right mind could possibly think that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps but given that he's chairing the meeting at which the Office Bearers will be appointed (I'm not standing for any of the positions) would it not have been the wiser option to refrain till after that event in case it could be perceived as potentially gaining an advantage by other prospective candidates.

 

I don't doubt the Reverend's suitability for so much as a single second and I certainly am not accusing him of bias in any shape or form, frankly I'm at a loss as how anyone in their right mind could possibly think that.

 

 

You want us to believe that, really?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, show where the f*&k I have accused him of bias in any shape or form.

 

By making that statement - " ... in case it could be perceived as potentially gaining an advantage by other prospective candidates." - you are implying that BH could conceivably gain some kind of advantage over the other prospective candidates by speaking to the Rev. McQuarrie. For that to happen, you are implicating the Rev McQuarrie in granting any kind of conceivable advantage. We know this because you tell us that the Rev. McQuarrie will chair the meeting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By making that statement - " ... in case it could be perceived as potentially gaining an advantage by other prospective candidates." - you are implying that BH could conceivably gain some kind of advantage over the other prospective candidates.

 

That is for the other candidates to decide is it not?

 

For that to happen, you are implicating the Rev McQuarrie in granting any kind of conceivable advantage. We know this because you tell us that the Rev. McQuarrie will chair the meeting.

 

I'm not implicating the Rev McQuarrie in f*&k all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is for the other candidates to decide is it not?

 

 

 

I'm not implicating the Rev McQuarrie in f*&k all.

 

1. Then unless you have spoken to the other candidates you should not be commenting or implying any untoward intentions by any of the candidates.

2. It's funny how other people see things different from ourselves when our juices are flowing !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Then unless you have spoken to the other candidates you should not be commenting or implying any untoward intentions by any of the candidates.

2. It's funny how other people see things different from ourselves when our juices are flowing !!!

 

Like people might feel that you're putting words in others mouth through your own views?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Then unless you have spoken to the other candidates you should not be commenting or implying any untoward intentions by any of the candidates.

 

I've no intention of contacting any candidates at all before the meeting.

 

I see it's moved from accusing Reverend McQuarrie of bias to implying untoward intentions by any of the candidates, what next?

 

 

 

2. It's funny how other people see things different from ourselves when our juices are flowing !!!

 

You've already admirably proven that you'll read whatever you want into whatever someone posts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.