Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

That's a position I cannot possibly support, I'm of the opinion the club needs to engage with as wide a cross-section of the support as possible.

 

 

 

 

The letters A & H are a wee clue!

When the inaugural meeting contains a suggestion that the club should not meet other fan groups, the cynicism that many feel towards this body seems to be fully justified.

 

What was the response to such an absurd suggestion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When the inaugural meeting contains a suggestion that the club should not meet other fan groups, the cynicism that many feel towards this body seems to be fully justified.

 

What was the response to such an absurd suggestion?

 

I can only answer for myself and I cannot make it any clearer than in the first line of the reply you quoted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like those who love "committees" , "Protocols", "constitutions" blah blah fucking blah will love this.... Think this group will talk more about themselves than become an effective fans voice..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd interpret more that that people shouldn't offer gratuitous abuse as opposed to valid, constructive concerns.

 

For example, Alan shouldn't be saying Mohsni is an useless overpaid idiot but Billy can question why our manager's policy is to persevere with under-performing players with discipline problems...

 

Much like Gersnet then. Respect is all that is asked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think BH said Stuart MacQuarrie chaired the meeting and took minutes which were subsequently added to by others.

 

I disagree slightly with that summation while Stuart did chair the meeting my own understanding is another board member supplied Stuart with a record of the meeting which Stuart adapted and submitted as the minute and after a few amendments it was submitted and is what you see on the website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree slightly with that summation while Stuart did chair the meeting my own understanding is another board member supplied Stuart with a record of the meeting which Stuart adapted and submitted as the minute and after a few amendments it was submitted and is what you see on the website.

 

Would have to be AH, seems he was the only one there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.