MoodyBlue 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Based on the info posted on this forum, I calculate that the Good Guys have about 49.64%. However I have a figure of 26.84 of unknown allegiance to date. Should Prior and River Mercantile be backing DK as rumoured, this would add 7.12% to the Good Guys cause. I suspect this will be clearer within the next 9 days or so as more 8.3's are announced. I am convinced the good side can definitely command over 50% at the moment. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 STV Sport have created these graphics this morning... Rangers shareholders http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/305651-who-owns-rangers-our-detailed-breakdown-of-the-shareholders-at-ibrox/? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,257 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 From up there ... BPH is Hazem Nabil Houssami 4.43m shares 5.43%Margarita is BC Abela. 2.6m shares 3.19% ... so the veil's been lifted. Anyone dug deeper about these two persons / entities? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 The biggest concern is the 26% controlled by the Easdales. I don't think it is any coincidence that they have remained at that figure. Most (any) major decision has to receive 75% approval from the shareholders....by holding 26% the Easdales can effectively veto ANYTHING they want!!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 (edited) From up there ... ... so the veil's been lifted. Anyone dug deeper about these two persons / entities? Both have previously been named. Edited January 7, 2015 by Rangersitis 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinker 882 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 (edited) STV Sport have created these graphics this morning... Rangers shareholders http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/305651-who-owns-rangers-our-detailed-breakdown-of-the-shareholders-at-ibrox/? This is the info table from the same article - I've tried to assign sides in a 4th column (forgive my ignorance if I've got any wrong - I'd be amazed if I haven't). It looks pretty good for +50% King though... [TABLE=width: 520] [TR] [TD]Name[/TD] [TD]Holding[/TD] [TD]%[/TD] [TD]Side[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Dave King[/TD] [TD=align: right]11,869,505[/TD] [TD=align: right]14.57%[/TD] [TD]King[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]George Taylor[/TD] [TD=align: right]7,575,000[/TD] [TD=align: right]9.30%[/TD] [TD]King[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Douglas Park[/TD] [TD=align: right]5,000,000[/TD] [TD=align: right]6.14%[/TD] [TD]King[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]River and Mercantile Asset Management LLP[/TD] [TD=align: right]4,704,827[/TD] [TD=align: right]5.77%[/TD] [TD]King[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Artemis Investment Management LLP[/TD] [TD=align: right]4,286,000[/TD] [TD=align: right]5.26%[/TD] [TD]King[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]George Letham[/TD] [TD=align: right]3,299,515[/TD] [TD=align: right]4.05%[/TD] [TD]King[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Kieran Prior[/TD] [TD=align: right]1,100,740[/TD] [TD=align: right]1.35%[/TD] [TD]King[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Rangers First[/TD] [TD=align: right]610,000[/TD] [TD=align: right]0.75%[/TD] [TD]King[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Phillip Nash[/TD] [TD=align: right]233,031[/TD] [TD=align: right]0.29%[/TD] [TD]King[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Norman Crighton[/TD] [TD=align: right]96,222[/TD] [TD=align: right]0.12%[/TD] [TD]King[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Mike Ashley[/TD] [TD=align: right]7,265,000[/TD] [TD=align: right]8.92%[/TD] [TD]Ashley[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Sandy Easdale[/TD] [TD=align: right]4,242,110[/TD] [TD=align: right]5.21%[/TD] [TD]Ashley[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Blue Pitch Holdings[/TD] [TD=align: right]4,000,000[/TD] [TD=align: right]4.91%[/TD] [TD]Ashley[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Margarita Funds Holding Trust[/TD] [TD=align: right]2,600,000[/TD] [TD=align: right]3.19%[/TD] [TD]Ashley[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Cazenove Capital Management Limited[/TD] [TD=align: right]2,450,000[/TD] [TD=align: right]3.01%[/TD] [TD]Ashley[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]FMR LLC[/TD] [TD=align: right]2,000,000[/TD] [TD=align: right]2.45%[/TD] [TD]Ashley[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]James Easdale[/TD] [TD=align: right]572,749[/TD] [TD=align: right]0.70%[/TD] [TD]Ashley[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Discretionary clients of Hargreave Hale[/TD] [TD=align: right]69,450[/TD] [TD=align: right]0.09%[/TD] [TD]Ashley[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]David Somers[/TD] [TD=align: right]61,186[/TD] [TD=align: right]0.08%[/TD] [TD]Ashley[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Unaccounted for[/TD] [TD=align: right]17,443,866[/TD] [TD=align: right]21.41%[/TD] [TD]?[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Legal and General Investment Management Limited[/TD] [TD=align: right]2,000,000[/TD] [TD=align: right]2.45%[/TD] [TD]?[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD=align: right]81,479,201[/TD] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] Edited January 7, 2015 by Thinker 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
True_Ger_1872 2 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 From SoS... The latest Mike Ashley dastardly plan uncovered.Mikes latest attempt to secure more of our blue pounds may yet come to fruition. If it is successful it will be no doubt sold to us as a " "normalised deal" His offer before Christmas was to obtain another 25% of Rangers Retail and he would pay for the privilege which could let the board sell it to the fans as cash not a loan. He is still trying to push this through. The boards plan is however to have some sort of buy back clause put in that would in effect make it just another loan. There is absolutely no need to give away even more future income streams nor do what would essentially be a fancy loan if the buy back was successful as there's money available immediately from those wishing to invest proper money in to our club. Is this the last chance for the rats to rob Rangers? Will this deal be done as part of his exit strategy? It remains to be seen but at least now the Rangers fans can see what he is trying to achieve. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 (edited) After all last weeks hullabaloo, I'd forgotten that Artemis still had a reasonable holding. How do we think Cazenove and L&G view things ?? Edited January 7, 2015 by MoodyBlue 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,346 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 I'd have thought Ally would be on the above list? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinker 882 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 After all last weeks hullabaloo, I'd forgotten that Artemis still had a reasonable holding. How do we think Cazenove and L&G view things ?? I was surprised to see Artemis on there too. I suppose they're hoping a new regime will increase the value of their remaining holding (?) I don't know much about Cazenove, but I seem to remember them being mentioned alongside BPH and MH in the past. Could be completely wrong there though. And I'd like to think a respectable company like Legal and General would be against the current controversial regime, but who knows? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.