Bluedell 5,599 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 It's obvious the Rangers board wanted rid off them and what has happened this week allowed them to do that without paying them any compensation. It's negligent to turn down the opportunity to get compensation from a third party if it was likely they were going somewhere else. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,612 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 Absolutely that's my point. Dont understand why the board didnt get rid off them earlier in the week though. Why wait til friday night ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,105 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 So why have we allowed them to go without compensation? Is it amateur hour in the board room? It isn't even that good. Had Warburton, Weir and McParland been sacked by Rangers – whose board had become disenchanted by repeated connections with clubs in England - the club would have had to pay £1.2 million compensation. As matters stand, Telegraph Sport understands that outstanding contractual commitments will cost Rangers £500,000. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/02/10/mark-warburton-resigns-asrangers-manager/ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,612 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 It's negligent to turn down the opportunity to get compensation from a third party if it was likely they were going somewhere else. Where were they going to go then ? The Rangers board wanted them out. This week they got the opportunity 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 825 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 It's negligent to turn down the opportunity to get compensation from a third party if it was likely they were going somewhere else. Agreed, but everything is sounding verbal at the moment which holds no weight at all. To prove they agreed to go to Forest or Forest tapped them would be the road to go down next - of course if this is the case! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,716 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 It's the job of the Board indeed their fiscal duty to plan for all eventualities. In football losing a manager is a regular occurrence, so having a replacement in mind even on a temporary basis should be par for the course. Well, since managers are not plenty and sign for clubs every other day, the board would have a hell of a job to keep track of that while never utter a whisper to not unsettle the current manager, generally speaking that is. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,716 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 Where were they going to go then ? The Rangers board wanted them out. This week they got the opportunity I really would like to see some flesh on the bones of that rumour. To me - and no disrespect - that sounds like the claims that the Russians fiddled with the elections in the US of A so that Trump stole the show. "We all know it, the FBI has evidence, so it must be true!" And have they presented any evidence? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 I'd suspect the board have known that Warburton wanted out and that's why the finances were held in check during the close season. Reading between the lines of what little we know, the board have got it right. We've recovered from worse situations and will do so again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 Appears the most plausible scenario doing the rounds. why would a whole management team jump at this time of the season...too late for forest this year...doesn't add up 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 Dont understand why the board didnt get rid off them earlier in the week though. Why wait til friday night ? Perhaps they were getting set to make an announcement yesterday then got thrown by the new demands? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.