Jump to content

 

 

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 18/11/19 in all areas

  1. I know this wasnt you @ian1964 and you were just passing info on, but having spoken to an officer in attendance on Saturday, the only reason the police had to go in was because some wee neds in the UB decided to try to SET FIRE to a Wrexham flag that they had stolen from our Welsh guests in a pub pre-game. They were quite happy to let things go until that point, when for supporter and stadium safety they had to go in. What in the world would make our supporters want to burn a flag INSIDE our ground, with plastic seating all around? I sincerely hope those responsible are identified and given life bans. I'm sure I speak or the vast majority of Rangers fans when I say we do not want people like this in our ground or supporting our club.
    3 points
  2. He played 71 minutes of a 4-2 win.
    3 points
  3. It's been oft repeated that Rangers usually find a way to lose it in this kind of scenario and history shows this to have some validity. However, the way we are playing the game in Europe seems to be different and gives me a degree of confidence that isn't normal in this situation, I'm almost optimistic but would very much like to see the job done in Rotterdam and not depend on the last game.
    3 points
  4. I’ve maintained all along this was a yahoo plot inside & outside HMRC. The aim was to keep Rangers in a financial straitjacket for years, unsellable & with the bank in control But there were 2 events they hadn’t planned for:-1) whyte 2)winning the BTC For me, Whyte’s plan was to force an administration & try get HMRC(& others) to settle everything owed via a CVA. And Rangers emerge debt free. It was high risk, unlikely to work & didn’t Firstly he had to force an administration. He wasn’t going to get it via the BTC or wee tax case. So he withheld tax/NI to force HMRC to the table.And it worked. But the yahoo plot had made its first error. It allowed Whyte to go for almost 6 months without paying tax/NI.(other clubs only got 1or 2 months). They had to build up sufficient debt to block a CVA because the BTC had been appealed & there was no guarantee they’d win it & indeed HMRC lost the FTTT & UTTT. Winning the BTC will now involve BDO asking all sorts of questions about penalties & whether or not they can be applied. And no doubt also asking about the length of time Whyte never paid tax. As we saw last week with bizarre panicky tweets one or two seem very edgy indeed within HMRC. 2020 should be interesting....
    2 points
  5. One game at a time is what it's all about. Hamilton on Sunday is arguably more important than the final two EL matches. Feyenoord will be tough and I'd be satisfied with a point there.
    2 points
  6. The suggestion, from Tannochside Bear, post 63, is that Rangers' fans set a Wrexham flag on fire in the stand, and that the Polis had to intervene. That kind of behaviour is, at the least, foolhardy, and blameworthy.
    2 points
  7. It would either result in my blood pressure being life-threateningly high or I'd have a mental breakdown due to nerves.
    2 points
  8. Freehold property book value was £39 million.
    1 point
  9. Why does it make a difference? If Porto win, we need a draw in our last game to qualify, whether we win or draw against Feyenoord.
    1 point
  10. Proof that you can make stats say pretty much anything you want. So a couple of hundred successful passes from side to side in the final third, the vast majority of which will be of no consequence to getting a shot at goal, but hey lets make a table of this stat and pretend it is actually meaningful in some way. If there is a further column in this research which tells you how many goals were scored from this possession, then that may actually be of some significance, but without it it's completely irrelevant. Still, its another lazy story to fill a page in a dead newspaper. I feel all dirty as I actually clicked it to see what the hell they were on about. All I will concede is at least the writer had the decency to say that it doesnt do you any good with Man City lying 4th in their league despite having all this final third possession.
    1 point
  11. So why bring them up? Were you sitting with the UBs? If not, why would the 3 youngsters be UBs? Please do not make baseless accusations about Rangers fans groups.
    1 point
  12. Since the Restoration of Rangers Graves Project was launched in 2014 we’ve restored 36 plots. These have ranged from Founders,Presidents, Chairman, Managers, Players and fellow supporters of our Club who perished at the Ibrox disasters. As our restoration work continues we’re needing help from anyone within the industry who can spare some time to help us with the re-erecting, cleaning and re-lettering of stones. If you have experience in this field and would like to get involved in the project please send an email to thefounderstrail@gmail.com or call 0790 2855536 for a chat.
    1 point
  13. It would be better to thrash them in the semi-final, and then go on to win it.
    1 point
  14. In terms of qualifying, is a win any better than a draw? I've just had a look at the permutations and I'm not sure it is.
    1 point
  15. Getting a result away to Feyenoord is going to be incredibly tough! I think a draw is most likely
    1 point
  16. I would fancy our chances against either of them. We should fear nobody as we are a good side. I reckon we could go another couple of rounds anyway?
    1 point
  17. The same type of "NEDS" who throws flares almost injuring a photographer whom I would not call a supporter but a total "neanderthal delinquent". No doubt will have a cup final ticket to be with his "GANG".as the club do not seem to take action on this group and afford them tickets in same area. So unless they are registered as "family & friends" for tickets bias by the club is being shown.
    1 point
  18. 1 point
  19. If we reach the latter stages of Europe, would they agree to some of our games being postponed? It would help the coefficient and help Scotland's standing. I think we all know the answer, so what's good for the goose.....
    1 point
  20. I don’t give a stuff what the ”national” team does, total disinterest, and they should keep their noses out of club affairs. If this goes ahead, I really hope it backfires on them badly.
    1 point
  21. Save the name calling for the opposition please.
    1 point
  22. Unfortunately that is the way it works mate. Neds or not, if they are on CCCS then they have as much right as you or me to be getting those tickets.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to London/GMT+01:00


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.