They honestly tried to justify it in that way ? What an embarrassment indeed.
If you look at Balogun's he actually gets the ball and his momentum through the ball rolls his foot over the ball. Is it a red ? Borderline for me but certainly can't complain too heavily as it could have seriously injured the opponent.
Look at Ojala's tackle on Wright though. It is actually, IMO, WORSE than Balogun's for reasons previously explained. Both feet off the ground (Balogun's trailing leg was on the ground, so Balogun was in control). Both feet off the ground immediately means you are out of control. The fact he also caught Wright means he clearly was endangering an opponent. Wright avoiding a leg break is completely irrelevant. Not so sure there was intent but he didnt get any more of the ball than Balogun did.
I am actually surprised that any Rangers fans can accept Balgun's was a red but consider Ojala's a yellow - differing opinions I guess - for me though, if anything, the cards were in the reverse of what they could/should have been. Balogun's was more a yellow than Ojala's and Ojala's was more a red than Balogun's.
What is almost being forgotten is that Rangers really should have finished that game with more players on the pitch than Motherwell due to the shirt pulling inconsistencies. Arfield booked for shirt pulling, yet how many Motherwell players avoided the same booking fate ? And at least one of them was booked for the penalty too, which would have meant red.
VAR can't come soon enough, although some of those decisions, admittedly, wouldnt be overturned (yellows for shirt pulling for example)