Jump to content

 

 

Bluedell

  • Posts

    17,839
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    99

Everything posted by Bluedell

  1. Must have been too busy chatting!
  2. Following preseason and the European games, my selection has changed. McGregor Tavernier - Goldson - Katic - Barasic Jack - Davis - Aribo Ojo - Morelos - Arfield
  3. Yeah, I heard Hastie had a nightmare against Mansfield.
  4. Did they read out the teams before the game today? I didn't notice them doing it.
  5. I don't think so. They seem to have been specifically told and our tickets had the other turnstyles noted on them. They made a comment about the change being for last night only. I checked the tickets for the friendlies and they don't have any turnstyles noted on them.
  6. No, but I was refused entrance at the turnstyles that I've used for the past 20 years, the ones with my section of the ground above it. We were told to use a different turnstyle that took us out at a different part of the ground. All vey strange.
  7. I think that you are wrong. It may not be reasonable but that's the way that courts work. The club may put forward your argument, and we both know that it's a good one, but it's not necessarily a legal one. The point is probably a moot one anyway as the method of calculation of the loss will probably be clearly defined within the agreement, as it's unlikely SD lawyers haven't already thought of it before the agreement was signed.
  8. If actual sales for the period are known then the court would use them and not sales in the past. The current level of sales are what SD are missing out on.
  9. The previous deal and previous sales would be irrelevant. If SD were give the chance to match the deal then surely it would be under the new terms and therefore new volumes. I guess there could be a counter-argument to say that sales would be lower because it was SD and there may be a level of boycott but not sure that would hold up in court.
  10. They should be able to demonstrate how much they make from the sale of a strip, and they could presumably establish the number of strips currently being sold, so it shouldn't be too difficult for them to demonstrate their losses.
  11. He did, but he shouldn't have had to and there will be other times where we'd have been punished or the ref wouldn't have blown for a free kick.
  12. You can google it. I guess there can be a level of pedantry about the meaning, but it's a song in bad taste and not one that I think that should be sung
  13. Immense in the first half but got caught 4 or 5 time in the second half and we were lucky not to lose a goal because of his bad positioning.
  14. You've never heard it at Ibrox?
  15. And we've seen it ramp up over the past few weeks to keep another distasteful story from the other side of the city out of the news.
  16. So you wouldn't attend a cup semi or final at Hampden?
  17. I like going to the football with like-minded individuals. I want to be able to sit with people that share my views on how the SNP are targeting our club, for example and that the rise of Nationalism is severely damaging our our country. That doesn't make me a bigot.
  18. I think it will depend on who we have on the pitch and who we're playing. It'll be good if we have the option of both formations.
  19. Oxford, Marseille and St Josephs at home.
  20. The first time I heard the £250K mentioned was from David Edgar around a week ago and presume that he got it from a source in the club. It won't be a million miles away from the final figure.
  21. The position does exist and we've been playing 4-3-3 frequently during this season so far, as well as the 4-3-2-1.
  22. I bought a debenture when it was being built, sat in my seat for the first game and never went back because it was so uncomfortable.
  23. Rangers, as things stand. However it depends on how things go with the rest of the transfer window. I also have major concerns about the referees and compliance officer and think that they could have a major influence on the destination of the title.
  24. The level of cover for the full backs seems to me to be greater under 4-3-2-1 than it is 4-3-3 as the 3 in the former tend to lie deeper than in the latter. Width from the "2" is being sacrificed to allow greater cover. If playing 4-3-3 then there may be a greater need for cover from the Candeias position, although Ojo and Jones may be up for that job, unlike the 2 who started last night. Yes, talking positions.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.