Jump to content

 

 

Rangers FC no longer for sale


Recommended Posts

STV use juniors to update their website based upon the morning's papers mate.

 

As for the Stock Exchange announcement, I still believe that was a formality, and the ambiguity is just there to cover the back of both parties.

 

It may be deeper than that BdTS, the LSE brief not STV. As also picked up by NL, the Offeror in this case RFC Holdings Guernsey were required by the code to respond to press speculation, and as advised by the code respond very carefully, which they did. The question is who leaked and caused the speculation and why, my money says it wasn't anyone working with Mr Ellis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may be deeper than that BdTS, the LSE brief not STV. As also picked up by NL, the Offeror in this case RFC Holdings Guernsey were required by the code to respond to press speculation, and as advised by the code respond very carefully, which they did. The question is who leaked and caused the speculation and why, my money says it wasn't anyone working with Mr Ellis.

 

I think that's entirely possible.

 

rbr's info from last week about the Trust having a copy of the Ellis proposal appears to be correct, btw. :whistle:

Link to post
Share on other sites

rbr's info from last week about the Trust having a copy of the Ellis proposal appears to be correct, btw. :whistle:

 

Didn't their high heid yins deny this on their forum of choice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's gone from rumour to scaremongering to stramash and back again. No idea what to believe any more.

 

Believe nothing until something is being reported on the club website. I think that is what I'm going to do. I will look at paper websites and laugh at their exclusives and taking things out of context its all I can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't their high heid yins deny this on their forum of choice?

 

No, but Mr. Dingwall did. :D

 

Basically because it was a load of made-up pish which rbr misguidedly believed. But to be fair, he said he posted it in good faith so we move on.

 

Well, we did move on until BdTS turns up here and starts it up again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Believe nothing until something is being reported on the club website. I think that is what I'm going to do. I will look at paper websites and laugh at their exclusives and taking things out of context its all I can do.

.

The whole thing's been a chaotic mess from start to finish from within the club, within the online support & outwith the club and support in the media. Just a total mess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, but Mr. Dingwall did. :D

 

Basically because it was a load of made-up pish which rbr misguidedly believed. But to be fair, he said he posted it in good faith so we move on.

 

Well, we did move on until BdTS turns up here and starts it up again!

 

To be fair Mr Dingwall has posted a variety of information suggesting he knows more than he does. In saying that, we all like to fly a few kites so I'll file those posts under that description.

 

PS: He certainly does not know about who Graham Duffy employs as a stockbroker - that much is certain. But anything to deflect attention from the disappointing splits/arguments we've seen on FF of late. :whistle:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.