blueflag 378 Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 got to agree about why would they do that I just saying what im reading on shitter sorry twitter but yeh apparently so. and they report on sportshound twitter mcoist confirmed tonight there looking at him Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4 Beta 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueflag 378 Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 the hearald reporting its for jan window and he still at vc. wee see Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4 Beta 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 If it's Jan window that makes more sense but then we would need to pay a fee, unless he's so dire for Vancouver that they free him then. At 34, he would do a job in the SPFL1 and SPFLC but by the time we get to the SPFLP he will be going on 36 and that's a bit of a stretch even for a fit guy like him, is it not? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 contracts in the mls are owned by the league iirc. we would almost certainly need to pay a fee unless he pays for his release. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted August 27, 2013 Share Posted August 27, 2013 contracts in the mls are owned by the league iirc. we would almost certainly need to pay a fee unless he pays for his release. Correct, thats why I said and the MLS are hardly going to free him. at #418. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Not disputing Miller at the moment is a better player than Clark, but surely in a Division he knows, Clark should be given the chance to improve. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Not disputing Miller at the moment is a better player than Clark, but surely in a Division he knows, Clark should be given the chance to improve. If he brings Miller now or in January, he would HAVE to play him and assuming that Daly is an almost certain starter as well, then neither Little nor Clark would be likely to get a game most weeks. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,149 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Miller would only be signed if we're able to move Shiels on. I'm told we've offered him to at least one club... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Miller would only be signed if we're able to move Shiels on. I'm told we've offered him to at least one club... Interesting and not a major surprise; but the difference is that right now, Shiels doesn't look like a starter, Miller would be. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 Miller would only be signed if we're able to move Shiels on. I'm told we've offered him to at least one club... If true, then that is utterly depressing. Signing Miller at his age and moving on Shiels who's 5 years younger really stinks of jobs for the boys. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.