the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 I guess there's roughly a 26% chance it was a Morton fan who's been in the clink. much higher than that probably giving irvine was the one telling the papers about it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 much higher than that probably giving irvine was the one telling the papers about it. Who said that the scoop came from Toxic Jack? Is that a rumour? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,148 Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 Various people from SoS to Keith Jackson are suggesting Irvine is briefing the media on negative King stories. As for who reported King (if indeed anyone did) the club have denied it came from them so that just leaves one of his fiercer critics from elsewhere. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 Various people from SoS to Keith Jackson are suggesting Irvine is briefing the media on negative King stories. Right, so just a continuation of what Irvine's been doing all along - spinning against anyone opposing his paymasters. As for who reported King (if indeed anyone did) the club have denied it came from them so that just leaves one of his fiercer critics from elsewhere. Sadly, I think we have one or two people in our support who wouldn't think twice about reporting Dave King just to stick there nose in the whole affair because they can't help themselves or out of some twisted form of spite because they don't want King involved in Rangers, but I'm sure it's just a genuinely concerned shareholder..... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 it's not dave king they don't want involved. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 it's not dave king they don't want involved. What's that mean? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 What's that mean? It's all about people like mark Dingwall and such. That's who they don't want involved. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,240 Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 AFAIK Somers, Wallace, Nash, et al have had not that much to do with Mark Dingwall thus far, Easdale had a few squabbles with that SoS chap though, while Chris Graham has been much more prominent than the Grandmaster of late. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 I think it pertinent to remember that it is the 'Union of Fans' who are involved in negotiations rather than individuals, who may speak on behalf of the group. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,148 Posted May 15, 2014 Share Posted May 15, 2014 It's all about people like mark Dingwall and such. That's who they don't want involved. Is Mark involved with UoF in a formal basis? I don't see FF highlighted on their website so not sure how that would work? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.