Bearman 9 Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Lukas Jutkiewicz's loan to Birminham ends in January, maybe we could do some kind of deal to bring him here and send Barton back to Burnley? Jut could do a turn for us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg_Mcnoleg 50 Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 When he left, was he still wearing the Club tie? Do you think there's a ceremonial tie cutting when Rangers sack you? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Do you think there's a ceremonial tie cutting when Rangers sack you? they burn the tie in a crucible and the gypsy curse is lifted BANG MW is back in the room and we go back to playing exciting imaginative football again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 It's just not the gambling though is it DB, it's a totting up procedure the club will sack him by imo. They would need to give him warnings. A verbal warning and then 3 written warnings. I doubt that they are at that stage yet. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacK1950 2,231 Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Thank goodness for a little LIGHT fun amid the doom and gloom. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 They would need to give him warnings. A verbal warning and then 3 written warnings. I doubt that they are at that stage yet. No but you can do each offence separately one after the other and you can skip stages if the offence merits it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 They would need to give him warnings. A verbal warning and then 3 written warnings. I doubt that they are at that stage yet. Much depends on why they suspended him. If what he did is serious enough then warnings are not necessary. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Much depends on why they suspended him. If what he did is serious enough then warnings are not necessary. Yes but you can't suspend people for six weeks telling him he will return to training after a week and then 6 weeks later decide you want to sack him. This is a PR disaster for Rangers and could even effect other players thinking of signing for us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 (edited) Yes but you can't suspend people for six weeks telling him he will return to training after a week and then 6 weeks later decide you want to sack him. This is a PR disaster for Rangers and could even effect other players thinking of signing for us. He could have been and probably was suspended for a week while the matter was investigated. Next day he is shouting his mouth off . He was then contacted and maybe disputed the clubs version of events so was handed a further suspension - don't forget the betting stuff comes up too. He's called in today, continues to dispute or refuses to apologise so is sent away while the club either decide what to do or make prep to get shot of him. Meanwhile he's receiving a wage. Nobody knows what he did. Nobody knows what's been said between the parties. Perhaps the club were looking for an apology and it's Barton whose keeping the whole thing going ? It is only a PR disaster at this moment if we believe the ill informed speculation in the press. If it's shown the club are in the right it won't be. The point I'm attempting to make is, warnings, written or otherwise don't come into it if the offence is serious enough. Edited October 27, 2016 by boabie 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 He could have been and probably was suspended for a week while the matter was investigated. Next day he is shouting his mouth off . He was then contacted and maybe disputed the clubs version of events so was handed a further suspension - don't forget the betting stuff comes up too. He's called in today, continues to dispute or refuses to apologise so is sent away while the club either decide what to do or make prep to get shot of him. Meanwhile he's receiving a wage.Nobody knows what he did. Nobody knows what's been said between the parties. Perhaps the club were looking for an apology and it's Barton whose keeping the whole thing going ? It is only a PR disaster at this moment if we believe the ill informed speculation in the press. If it's shown the club are in the right it won't be. The point I'm attempting to make is, warnings, written or otherwise don't come into it if the offence is serious enough. As you say without the facts we cannot judge what is happening but Rangers certainly ain't looking pretty in the whole affair at this moment. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.