Jump to content

 

 

[FT] Rangers 2 (Miller 12; Waghorn 61) - 1 Morton


Recommended Posts

some very nervous players today. Got to say i am happy after that. We made changes to tactics during the game, the subs were dictated by the play. Most of all i loved the tactical change near the end, very impressed.

 

I know the edge of the seat attacking stuff doesn't suit everyone but i enjoyed that more than any recent game i can remember. Still have a long way to go but at least we are on the road now.

 

I think the attacking play was because they had to open up. I don't like the lack of control. I did like the 2 up top, however, and I can see it suiting Waghorn and Garner more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont know where you see 442

 

It was waghorn and miller through the middle with mckay and ohalleron wide as usual with tav sweeping behind the mid three

 

It sounds like your describing a 4-4-2. Tavernier was just occupying the half-space.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like your describing a 4-4-2. Tavernier was just occupying the half-space.

mckay and ohalleron played the same position they always do. Guess it depends on whether you class our usual formation as 451 or 433. for me its a 433

 

edit

tav sweeped behind when we attacked but he moved to RB when defending

Edited by trublusince1982
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cold, cold, cold!!! As Rousseau points out. Same old same old. Wes and Hodson don't like each other by looks of it, wonder if that's why MW kept playing Tav when he is clearly hopeless at defending? Thought Wes was going to take his head off, Hill had to calm him down!

Senderos should not play again. MW has some brass neck complaining about the scrutiny of his signings policy from DK! Waggy, Barrie and again Miller played well and as usual Hyndman was composed and a cut above the rest.

Looks like it will be Mcleish, hope he sorts things out!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How senderos has the CV he does i will never know. Hopefully Murty has the guts to drop him. I liked the small tactical changes he made today.

 

Keeping miller up against the back line more often and also the switching between halliday and tav when attacking, left halliday free in the box a couple of times, unfortunately he missed one he should have scored. Nice to see us mix things up though. Hopefully some confidence starts to come back and we get rid of the poor mistakes. Don't think its any coincidence we had two strikers come up with the goals today .off the top of my head i cant remember the last time that happened (no doubt someone will tell me it was just last week!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cold, cold, cold!!! As Rousseau points out. Same old same old. Wes and Hodson don't like each other by looks of it, wonder if that's why MW kept playing Tav when he is clearly hopeless at defending? Thought Wes was going to take his head off, Hill had to calm him down!

Senderos should not play again. MW has some brass neck complaining about the scrutiny of his signings policy from DK! Waggy, Barrie and again Miller played well and as usual Hyndman was composed and a cut above the rest.

Looks like it will be Mcleish, hope he sorts things out!!

 

I agree with most of what you've put there. But there's more than Senderos who should never play again Coop.

Agreed too - it was fecking freezing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BBC were miffed:

 

"Rangers 2-1 Morton

Posted at

90+3 mins

Luke Donnelly hang your head in shame! Rangers get in an almighty mess at the back with a mix up between Lee Hodson and keeper Wes Foderingham gifting the ball to Ross Forbes, who lays it off to Donnelly at the edge of the box. With Foderingham posted missing, there's a couple of defenders guarding the goal but the Morton substitute can only lift a shot over the crossbar. Criminal..."

 

Where's that from? Not here ...

 

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/38871566

 

... or they erased the whole minute including Waghorn's shot at the keeper from clsoe distance.

 

BTW, it completely bypassed me that Andy Murdoch was playing for Morton. I did not that they had about 3 or 4 Yahoo-loanees on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.