Leaderboard

Cannot believe the amount of fans that think bringing back Gerrard is a good idea , it is utter madness.

Champions league 2nd qualifying round: draw - 18th June 1st leg 22-23 July 2nd leg 29-30 July SPFL fixtures published 20 June SPFL season starts first weekend in August.

I'd rather we didn't refer to a fitba club as an ecosystem, but here we are.

An intelligent man, who has been learning and developing his coaching skills since he was a teenager, and has since built up a good body of work at various clubs, implementing a progressive, possession-based style that dominates games even with little financial backing while showing an ability to develop players. His burd is fit.

Callum Davidson wants a word. 😉

His last 2 years he was hardly here , coaching staff ran the team. Its madness to let him anywhere near the club. He knows he has no chance of a big job again , thats why hes desperate to get back in.

These trendy kids nowadays, they don't half talk pish.

I’d rather we employed Muscat rather than Gerrard

If we never had a back row full of terrible defenders Dessers would have been a hero this season , McCoist used to miss sitters like him every game but always had a solid backline that never threw goals away every week.

Yes, you meant the group of clubs sitting under the Red Bull banner. However, the term 'ecosystem' is still just as deplorable in that context.

We have little idea of who's on the shortlist. Our lists are largely generated by the bookies.

Much as I'm underwhelmed, concerned even, by everything going on at the club currently, appointing Steven Gerrard as manager is hardly the act of lunatics. Assuming that Advocaat, Souness and McLeish are basically retired from club management then Gerrard's record in Scotland is better than any other manager who isn't a former Celtic manager. His departure from the club left a bad taste and his subsequent record is fairly ordinary. But then Walter Smith's time at Everton was mainly spent fighting relegation, Souness had some success but also failure as did McLeish. So success elsewhere is no guarantee of success here, and vice versa. I loved Stevie Davis as a player, my favourite player of the last 20 years, but I'd prefer an experienced number 2. I've no opinion on Henderson, he's playing for Ajax this season so clearly able to make a contribution on the park. If it's Gerrard, and i've no inside knowledge that it is, then he won't get the time he was given last time around. He won't get 3 seasons to build something, he'll get one if he's lucky. So I doubt there will be no 'building a system' or player development plans, it'll be about creating a side that can win the league next season. That will need experienced players, guys commanding bigger salaries and with very little future sell on value. Gerrard might be a better manager than last time, he's certainly more experienced. But the Tims aren't managed by Lennon this time, and whatever we might think of Rodgers he knows how to win the league.

Well done Spurs. Cant stand Man U

Out of that three, I'd be hoping it's Ancelotti.

Think Shankland is available for nothing just saying as his names not been mentioned in a while

She never came the first time, he would drive straight down the road after games to see them. Pretty sure his eldest daughter lives in Dubai where she is shacked up with the son of one of the Kinahan cartel bosses, and is pregnant to him. Not ideal baggage that.

Yeah, which is why I'm surprised he's the favourite. I can't see him coming in for a 3 year project, I don't think the fans will give him the time he got before and I don't think he'd come if he wasn't being guaranteed a side that could challenge for the title in year 1. Now, some would argue the current side, properly managed, could compete for the title, but I suspect Gerrard will want a number of players in first.

I have a little fear with some of these RB Salzburg guys that did well there, went on elsewhere and couldn't replicate the same quality outcomes. Perhaps the issue is that the RB Salzburg model is the value add and difference maker, and not the coaches. Who just happened to be a good fit for that club at the time. Jesse March, Matthias Jaissle(spelling). Roger Schmidt, Adi Hutter. Are they good enough in their own right or did they just 'fit in' with the RB Salzburg model which led them to success, then rinse and repeat this elsewhere. Without replicating the success. If only we could replicate that successful club model..

I never said we should keep him. I'm basing my opinion on the fact that when he got injured, it was reported that he was being sent back to Rotterdam, we were done with him as a loan player. Yet he ended up back, playing with the youths in their cup final, before being involved in the final squads. It would appear we have something in place with him.

The suggestion is Stewart and Steinsson. I guess the logic being that each represents and reports to current board / AC&49VC Tha band is getting together ACVC 😂😂😂 Andrew Cavenagh & 49ers Venture Capitalists.

You've lost me !! 😂 ----------- Should we rename them the 51'ers otherwise things might get confused 😂😂😂

The new manager is the most important appointment the club are going to make and the present board should have no say in the appointment without getting the okay from the new majority shareholders I know that the deal isn’t signed yet but no way this present board should be making the decision to appoint the new manager.

Hopefully Leicester f*ck right off!

It's only a pantomime if you get too absorbed in the clickbait press articles and social media. In reality, the club will be doing exactly what you said.

I didn't...

Just dont get the fascination of Russell Martin.

Yes, but I doubt that is the way the new owners will want to go. It would continue down the unsustainable road that even if it were to win a title, it wouldn't be able to build on it. What's more, we have already seen it happen and with Gerrard in charge. The 49ers aren't of the sugar daddy model. Neither do the new regulations permit it.

Yes, that makes total sense. However, you still have a supposed 49% chunk of various shareholders who aren't selling their shares. Do the '49%' stand asíde and allow prospective owners to do what they want ? _____________ The reason I bring this up is the strong rumour of a Gerrard appointment. I could envisage the current board making that choice but I'm struggling to understand the prospective new owners thinking behind it.

Wow! Give the other teams a chance!

The new owners would be calling the shots. The current board won't be able to do anything major without their say.

Hopefully Tav can get a place for him in his back room team.

I'm not positive about the takeover, but I'm not outright negative. I am dubious concerning the motivations of VC types, and how they might go about earning from their investment.

Will Inter be able to beat PSG - I hope so - or have they shot their bolt? How do you manage another performance like that last night? I’ve discounted Arsenal. (Good news for the Gunners)