Jump to content

 

 

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 18/08/20 in all areas

  1. The two I would go for would be Tavernier, Davis, Kamara and Arfield ?
    4 points
  2. You will recall the old boxing adage "women weaken legs". Of course, Willie Pastrano gives the lie to that, as does The Greatest, if we are to believe what we hear and read. I perused an article, some years ago, which mentioned an informal get together of old boxing trainers, household names in their day, and including among them, Angelo Dundee. The talk came around to the subject of women and boxers, specifically fraternisation before fights. One of the men present offered a story about Primo Carnera, the Ambling Alp, all 6'6" of him, and heavyweight champ in the 1930s. (You probably saw some of his fights.) It seems that the big Italian was so concerned about the deleterious effect of women pre-fight, that, and this is apparently true, for some time in the runs-up to his contests, he wore a thick rubber gasket around the base of his male organ. This he, and his trainer, believed would help him resist temptation, and retain strength and aggression. Angelo Dundee thought for a few seconds and said, "Carnera could have cut it off, and he still wouldn't have been a fuckin' fighter
    2 points
  3. I think our chances of winning anything will be more down to Celtc's failings than our own excellence. We have players and coaching staff who don't seem bothered about dropping points.
    2 points
  4. With the occasional exception, in most games the attitude throughout the team simply stinks. For much of the time it looks like players simply going through the motions. I don't see anger, aggression, passion, call it what you will. We continue to carry a loser's mentality that our current coaches seen unable to shift and while it remains we will win nothing. There needs to be a bloodletting at Rangers and one or two of our main players should be shown the door in an almighty show of managerial leadership. Souness knew the value of sacrifice, so did Walter.
    2 points
  5. That was around ten years ago; perhaps more so. Here, in Scotland, it's still the favoured approach. There are even some advocating that Rangers should adopt it. Dinosaurs... *cough* @DMAA *cough* ?
    2 points
  6. Two things that annoy me about us:- 1) kick-off, the ball goes back and we can’t get out of our own half 2) the amount of times we needlessly pass the ball backwards
    1 point
  7. Yes I watched the game. Was it the same one you watched where the Livingston keeper barely had a shot to save all game?
    1 point
  8. Exactly at one time players like Davis Grieg Shearer etc would have shown the slackers the way
    1 point
  9. Sometimes in games like sundays fancy dan tactics are useless the players of old would just roll their sleeves up and get stuck in but players and managers these days dont have that mentality no one's more disappointed than me about Sunday's result like lots of you men on here ive seen the best and the worst but on Sunday to me it looked like so e players were just not interested.
    1 point
  10. Don’t the tactics need to be better? A back four & two sitting MF players against a team camped in their own half virtually all game.
    1 point
  11. We can talk about what and what not we should have done on Sunday but the simple story is we as a team were not good enough to breach the Livingstone goal . We must do better .
    1 point
  12. Genuinely hope we don’t live to regret this. McCrorie could play the single defensive MF role I’d prefer us to play as opposed to the two we had on Sunday
    1 point
  13. 1 point
  14. 1 point
  15. There's a financial downside to that which wouldn't suit Rangers. Only one gate presumably split. Two legs two gates each side keeping all of their own home gate.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to London/GMT+01:00


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.