Bill

Yup, what was all the fuss about? I hate to see us drifting into a state of victimhood that was once monopolised by others. Perhaps those on this forum who have this tendency will find a mirror to look at and talk themselves out of it. They know who they are.

I really don't care who or where we play our first game of the season.

Absolutely. For all the justified talk about forwards, the biggest weakness needing addressed is our porous defence. We’re so vulnerable to cross balls. Can’t defend the back post, can’t defend the front post, centre backs pulled all over the place, midfield continually depleted covering for missing fullbacks. Seems to me our entire team has been bent to the needs and inadequacies of our fullbacks for too long. I want defensive fullbacks who can attack, not attacking fullbacks who can’t defend.

Always here for you 😏

Please ... it's too painful.

I'd go as far as to suggest that until we make that change we're not going to make the improvements we need.

What we need is a RB who can defend.

If Doncaster was ever found to be in serious breach of his contract, could he whistle goodbye to that 24 month payment?

Institutional, systemic and entrenched. This is worse that cricket and there must be an enquiry immediately.

Personally I don't understand the fuss about Saudi Arabia doing what English clubs have been doing for years

Ha ha yes I suppose there is that possibility. I wonder who it is at Rangers that's pushing the campaign against Doncaster ....... Bennett?

It does me good to see Rangers so determined to maintain some pressure on the SPFL. I just hope the compensation awarded is significant - enough to embarrass the rest of the league as they see their money going to Rangers because of the incompetence of Doncaster's mob.

This looks like an easier fight. The bigger question is how much money we win.

Don’t confuse directors with shareholders. Boards are comprised of directors who may or may not be shareholders. Their role as directors is to run the business on behalf of the shareholders. Every shareholder is an owner and every shareholder is an investor but most shareholders will not be directors. Directors are not owners unless they have invested in shares and therefore are also shareholders.

What’s the difference?

Why is there still so much contention surrounding the DoF/Manager relationship. It's not as if this is a new idea. It seems to be a relationship that's so prone to discord that it surely has to be a structural issue? Where is it so often going wrong.

He'll always be Tamundo to me.

Well respected and sadly missed. Lived a good life, which is all anyone can hope to do.

I keep reading the same mantra … “Beale doesn’t like Colak”. Where does this stuff come from?

Perhaps more than any other department at the club, our Commercial section has to be assessed at the end of term rather than the beginning. We'll only be able to make an informed judgement of Karin Virani's appointment at the end of his first whole financial period.

Maintaining traditions.

Ffs its a replica football shirt, not a fashion statement. Fans buy it for one reason only ... it's a replica of what our football team wears. That's all. No one but no one buys Rangers shirts because they think they're fashionable. So why pretend otherwise?

Surely worth at least a month’s Gersnet suspension.

Should sell in big numbers, which is pretty much all that matters.